 |
 
|
 |
 |
| |
 |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| ||||||||||
 |
|
|
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: [email protected]. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Self-Assessed Health Status and Selected Behavioral Risk Factors Among Persons With and Without Health-Care Coverage -- United States, 1994-1995Persons without health-care coverage are more likely to have poor health and be at greater risk for chronic disease outcomes than persons who have health-care coverage (1). In the United States, the number of persons and the proportion of the population without health-care coverage has increased each year since 1987 (2). State-specific surveillance of health-care coverage can be used to identify subgroups of the population who lack such coverage and may be at increased risk for poor health. To determine state-specific estimates of the prevalence of self-assessed health status and risk factors for chronic disease by health-care coverage status among adults aged 18-64 years, CDC analyzed data from the 1994 and 1995 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This report summarizes the results of that analysis and indicates that adults without health-care coverage were more likely than those with health-care coverage to have poor health status, to be current smokers, and to be less physically active. BRFSS is a state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged greater than or equal to 18 years. The 1995 BRFSS was conducted in the 50 states and the District of Columbia and was used to determine self-reported health-care coverage status and the selected risk factors of cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and self-assessed health status among adults aged 18-64 years. To assess health-care coverage status, respondents were asked "Do you have any kind of health-care coverage, including health insurance, prepaid plans such as HMOs, or governmental plans such as Medicare?" Smoking was assessed by asking "Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life?" and "Do you smoke cigarettes now?" Current smokers were persons who reported having smoked greater than or equal to 100 cigarettes during their lifetimes and who smoke now. Physical inactivity was assessed by asking the respondent "During the past month, did you participate in any physical activities or exercises such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening, or walking for exercise?" Persons were considered inactive during their leisure time if they answered no to this question. For the purpose of this report, the estimates for health status reflect the proportion of persons indicating either fair or poor health status. Data from the 50 states were weighted to represent state populations and used to produce point estimates; 95% confidence intervals were calculated using SUDAAN. During 1995, the prevalence of health-care coverage varied among states and ranged from 76.9% (Louisiana) to 93.3% (Hawaii) (median: 87.0%). The median prevalence of fair-to-poor self-assessed health status was 9.0% among persons with health-care coverage and 13.8% among those without coverage; state-specific prevalences among those with coverage ranged from 5.3% (Nebraska) to 17.3% (West Virginia), and among those without coverage, from 5.0% (New Jersey) to 27.9% (Kentucky) (Table_1). The median prevalence of smoking among those with health-care coverage was 22.8%, compared with 39.3% among those without coverage (Table_2). The median prevalence of physical inactivity was 25.1% among those with health-care coverage, compared with 31.2% among those without coverage. Reported by the following BRFSS coordinators: J Durham, MPA, Alabama; P Owen, Alaska; B Bender, Arizona; J Senner, PhD, Arkansas; B Davis, PhD, California; M Leff, MSPH, Colorado; M Adams, MPH, Connecticut; F Breukelman, Delaware; C Mitchell, District of Columbia; D McTague, MS, Florida; E Pledger, MPA, Georgia; J Cooper, MA, Hawaii; C Johnson, MPH, Idaho; B Steiner, MS, Illinois; N Costello, MPA, Indiana; P Busick, Iowa; M Perry, Kansas; K Asher, Kentucky; R Meriwether, MD, Louisiana; D Maines, Maine; A Weinstein, MA, Maryland; D Brooks, MPH, Massachusetts; H McGee, MPH, Michigan; N Salem, PhD, Minnesota; S Loyd, Mississippi; J Jackson-Thompson, PhD, Missouri; P Smith, Montana; S Huffman, Nebraska; E DeJan, MPH, Nevada; K Zaso, MPH, New Hampshire; G Boeselager, MS, New Jersey; W Honey, New Mexico; T Melnik, DrPH, New York; G Lengerich, VMD, North Carolina; J Kaske, MPH, North Dakota; R Indian, MS, Ohio; N Hann, MPH, Oklahoma; J Grant-Worley, MS, Oregon; L Mann, Pennsylvania; J Hesser, PhD, Rhode Island; J Ferguson, DrPH, South Carolina; M Gildemaster, South Dakota; D Ridings, Tennessee; R Diamond, MPH, Texas; R Giles, Utah; R McIntyre, PhD, Vermont; J Stones, Virginia; K Wynkoop-Simmons, PhD, Washington; F King, West Virginia; E Cautley, MS, Wisconsin; M Futa, MA, Wyoming. Cardiovascular Health Br and Behavioral Surveillance Br, Div of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note: The findings in this report indicate that, in most states, more persons who are without health-care coverage consider themselves to be in poor or fair health than those with health-care coverage. In addition, persons without health-care coverage reported higher levels of physical inactivity and current tobacco use than did persons who have health-care coverage. Higher levels of smoking and physical inactivity are both important risk factors for many chronic disease outcomes (3). Although the wide variation in prevalence of self-assessed health status, smoking, and physical inactivity by state may reflect, in part, differences in sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, income, and educational level), previous reports indicate that this variation persisted even after estimates were standardized to adjust for these differences (4). Differences in self-reported health between persons with and without coverage also may reflect factors that influence the perception of ill health (e.g., subclinical illness, lack of access to providers, and the negative effects of smoking and physical inactivity). The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, the study excluded households without telephones; previous studies indicate substantial differences in the characteristics of persons who reside in households without a telephone compared with those who reside in households with a telephone (5). Second, these estimates were only for adults and did not include persons aged less than 18 years. To adequately assess the impact of the lack of health-care coverage, information about the health status of children and young persons also should be considered (6). The BRFSS enables each state to document the proportion of its population without health-care coverage and the risk factor profile of this group. This information can be used to target subgroups for specific disease-prevention or health-promotion intervention efforts as well as for policy makers seeking to evaluate health-care changes at the state level. This information also can assist local and state health officials in anticipating the need for and planning of health-care and preventive-care services. The findings of this report and the results of previous studies that indicate that the number of insured in the United States increases annually and the uninsured are less likely to receive preventive-care services (7) underscore the need for state and national policies that facilitate the broadening of health-care coverage. References
Table_1 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size.
TABLE 1. Prevalence of fair-to-poor self-assessed health status among adults,
by state and health-care coverage (HCC) status -- United States, Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995
==============================================================================
HCC No HCC
------------------ ---------------------
State* % (95% CI+) % (95% CI)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama 11.5 (+/-2.2%) 22.2 (+/-5.7%)
Alaska 6.5 (+/-1.8%) 9.7 (+/-4.4%)
Arizona 10.6 (+/-4.5%) 18.9 (+/-7.1%)
Arkansas 11.5 (+/-1.9%) 18.2 (+/-4.9%)
California 10.5 (+/-2.2%) 18.6 (+/-5.2%)
Colorado 7.8 (+/-1.5%) 13.4 (+/-5.6%)
Connecticut 6.8 (+/-1.7%) 12.5 (+/-6.3%)
Delaware 10.8 (+/-1.7%) 11.8 (+/-4.3%)
Florida 10.1 (+/-1.4%) 13.9 (+/-3.5%)
Georgia 7.6 (+/-1.5%) 16.8 (+/-5.9%)
Hawaii 9.2 (+/-1.7%) 6.8 (+/-4.8%)
Idaho 7.5 (+/-1.3%) 10.8 (+/-3.3%)
Illinois 9.6 (+/-1.5%) 18.6 (+/-5.2%)
Indiana 10.4 (+/-1.6%) 15.9 (+/-5.5%)
Iowa 7.1 (+/-1.1%) 11.0 (+/-3.8%)
Kansas 7.4 (+/-1.5%) 11.8 (+/-4.4%)
Kentucky 14.5 (+/-2.1%) 27.9 (+/-5.7%)
Louisiana 10.3 (+/-2.1%) 18.5 (+/-4.6%)
Maine 8.3 (+/-1.9%) 13.7 (+/-3.5%)
Maryland 7.4 (+/-0.9%) 13.0 (+/-3.4%)
Massachusetts 8.9 (+/-1.8%) 11.7 (+/-5.4%)
Michigan 10.5 (+/-1.5%) 13.2 (+/-4.9%)
Minnesota 6.1 (+/-0.9%) 9.0 (+/-3.3%)
Mississippi 13.9 (+/-2.4%) 25.2 (+/-6.7%)
Missouri 8.0 (+/-1.8%) 17.2 (+/-5.8%)
Montana 9.0 (+/-2.3%) 13.6 (+/-5.4%)
Nebraska 5.3 (+/-3.4%) 19.3 (+/-2.5%)
Nevada 10.3 (+/-2.1%) 19.8 (+6.7%)
New Hampshire 6.3 (+/-1.5%) 15.3 (+/-6.9%)
New Jersey 9.3 (+/-2.2%) 5.0 (+/-6.9%)
New Mexico 11.8 (+/-2.5%) 25.9 (+/-7.2%)
New York 8.5 (+/-1.4%) 7.4 (+/-3.1%)
North Carolina 13.5 (+/-1.6%) 21.2 (+/-4.9%)
North Dakota 8.7 (+/-1.8%) 13.9 (+/-5.6%)
Ohio 10.5 (+/-2.2%) 12.2 (+/-6.0%)
Oklahoma 8.1 (+/-1.8%) 18.9 (+/-6.3%)
Oregon 7.7 (+/-1.3%) 11.8 (+/-4.1%)
Pennsylvania 9.1 (+/-1.7%) 10.6 (+/-3.5%)
Rhode Island 9.2 (+/-1.7%) 17.5 (+/-6.7%)
South Carolina 10.3 (+/-1.8%) 17.2 (+/-5.2%)
South Dakota 7.7 (+/-1.7%) 13.4 (+/-5.8%)
Tennessee 13.1 (+/-1.9%) 15.1 (+/-5.6%)
Texas 11.4 (+/-2.2%) 26.0 (+/-6.4%)
Utah 7.5 (+/-1.5%) 12.6 (+/-5.0%)
Vermont 8.1 (+/-1.4%) 11.2 (+/-4.2%)
Virginia 7.7 (+/-1.7%) 17.9 (+/-5.7%)
Washington 7.5 (+/-1.1%) 12.7 (+/-3.8%)
West Virginia 17.3 (+/-2.1%) 21.7 (+/-4.8%)
Wisconsin 6.2 (+/-1.5%) 9.6 (+/-5.2%)
Wyoming 8.4 (+/-1.4%) 10.3 (+/-3.6%)
Range 5.3-17.3 5.0-27.9
Median 9.0 13.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No data were available for the District of Columbia.
+ Confidence interval.
==============================================================================
Return to top. Table_2 Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size.
TABLE 2. Prevalence of cigarette smoking and physical inactivity, by state and health-care coverage (HCC) status -- United
States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1994-1995
===========================================================================================================================
Smoking* Physical
inactivity+
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
HCC No HCC HCC No HCC
----------------------- --------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------
State& % (95% CI@) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama 24.8 (+/-2.8%) 36.8 (+/- 6.9%) 38.5 (+/-3.3%) 56.0 (+/- 6.7%)
Alaska 23.9 (+/-3.5%) 35.5 (+/- 9.3%) 20.3 (+/-3.2%) 26.9 (+/- 8.5%)
Arizona 21.9 (+/-3.5%) 39.8 (+/- 7.9%) 20.2 (+/-3.0%) 29.4 (+/- 9.3%)
Arkansas 25.7 (+/-2.8%) 43.9 (+/- 6.7%) 30.7 (+/-3.2%) 39.0 (+/- 6.7%)
California 15.0 (+/-1.7%) 22.2 (+/- 5.4%) 18.2 (+/-1.7%) 32.9 (+/- 4.2%)
Colorado 21.5 (+/-2.4%) 35.1 (+/- 6.9%) 14.3 (+/-2.1%) 19.9 (+/- 6.0%)
Connecticut 21.2 (+/-2.5%) 35.4 (+/- 8.7%) 18.1 (+/-2.4%) 22.6 (+/- 7.2%)
Delaware 26.1 (+/-2.4%) 45.0 (+/- 7.7%) 32.0 (+/-2.8%) 42.9 (+/- 7.2%)
Florida 25.4 (+/-2.2%) 36.3 (+/- 5.0%) 25.2 (+/-2.1%) 32.6 (+/- 4.2%)
Georgia 20.8 (+/-2.1%) 32.3 (+/- 7.3%) 28.1 (+/-2.5%) 38.3 (+/- 7.0%)
Hawaii 18.8 (+/-2.4%) 30.6 (+/-11.1%) 20.3 (+/-2.4%) 22.1 (+/- 9.1%)
Idaho 18.0 (+/-1.9%) 38.7 (+/- 5.3%) 18.6 (+/-2.5%) 23.0 (+/- 5.9%)
Illinois 23.7 (+/-2.1%) 39.3 (+/- 7.0%) 30.0 (+/-2.7%) 41.6 (+/- 8.2%)
Indiana 28.2 (+/-2.3%) 49.4 (+/- 7.0%) 26.4 (+/-2.4%) 30.5 (+/- 6.3%)
Iowa 24.0 (+/-1.8%) 45.4 (+/- 6.3%) 29.9 (+/-2.4%) 36.1 (+/- 7.7%)
Kansas 22.7 (+/-2.4%) 45.9 (+/- 7.5%) 30.7 (+/-3.2%) 41.1 (+/- 9.6%)
Kentucky 27.6 (+/-2.6%) 44.2 (+/- 6.0%) 40.0 (+/-2.9%) 54.9 (+/- 5.9%)
Louisiana 24.2 (+/-2.9%) 39.7 (+/- 6.2%) 28.8 (+/-3.1%) 40.3 (+/- 6.5%)
Maine 25.9 (+/-3.3%) 40.0 (+/- 8.1%) 35.8 (+/-3.4%) 46.9 (+/- 8.8%)
Maryland 21.3 (+/-1.5%) 38.6 (+/- 5.4%) 26.8 (+/-1.8%) 32.6 (+/- 5.5%)
Massachusetts 22.0 (+/-2.6%) 38.3 (+/- 8.6%) 20.9 (+/-2.6%) 21.1 (+/- 7.2%)
Michigan 26.4 (+/-2.2%) 49.5 (+/- 7.7%) 20.8 (+/-2.1%) 23.6 (+/- 6.8%)
Minnesota 21.4 (+/-1.6%) 35.8 (+/- 6.2%) 17.8 (+/-1.5%) 28.1 (+/- 5.5%)
Mississippi 22.9 (+/-2.9%) 42.3 (+/- 8.0%) 34.2 (+/-3.3%) 44.3 (+/- 8.8%)
Missouri 24.8 (+/-2.8%) 39.7 (+/- 8.1%) 28.8 (+/-3.2%) 31.2 (+/- 7.5%)
Montana 21.0 (+/-3.0%) 32.9 (+/- 7.6%) 15.3 (+/-2.6%) 25.7 (+/- 7.3%)
Nebraska 22.1 (+/-2.4%) 53.0 (+/- 9.6%) 21.0 (+/-2.5%) 22.5 (+/- 7.3%)
Nevada 25.5 (+/-2.8%) 39.4 (+/- 7.6%) 20.1 (+/-2.5%) 21.2 (+/- 5.3%)
New Hampshire 20.0 (+/-2.6%) 40.8 (+/- 8.7%) 22.2 (+/-2.8%) 23.1 (+/- 6.8%)
New Jersey 19.6 (+/-2.9%) 39.2 (+/-12.7%) 26.3 (+/-3.1%) 33.5 (+/- 8.7%)
New Mexico 20.2 (+/-3.4%) 32.7 (+/- 7.4%) 15.9 (+/-2.8%) 24.4 (+/- 6.8%)
New York 21.9 (+/-2.3%) 38.2 (+/- 7.1%) 31.2 (+/-2.6%) 48.8 (+/- 7.5%)
North Carolina 26.6 (+/-2.1%) 41.7 (+/- 5.9%) 38.0 (+/-2.9%) 49.2 (+/- 7.0%)
North Dakota 23.3 (+/-2.6%) 41.2 (+/- 8.2%) 26.9 (+/-2.7%) 39.2 (+/- 7.5%)
Ohio 27.9 (+/-3.5%) 43.7 (+/-10.2%) 37.1 (+/-3.6%) 34.6 (+/- 9.9%)
Oklahoma 22.8 (+/-3.0%) 34.6 (+/- 7.1%) 25.1 (+/-2.9%) 32.1 (+/- 6.1%)
Oregon 22.0 (+/-2.2%) 35.7 (+/- 5.8%) 18.4 (+/-1.8%) 24.3 (+/- 4.7%)
Pennsylvania 25.4 (+/-2.3%) 43.9 (+/- 6.9%) 22.8 (+/-1.8%) 25.9 (+/- 5.9%)
Rhode Island 25.5 (+/-2.8%) 43.4 (+/- 8.4%) 25.0 (+/-1.3%) 26.8 (+/- 3.6%)
South Carolina 24.2 (+/-2.6%) 39.6 (+/- 7.1%) 28.7 (+/-2.6%) 29.5 (+/- 6.2%)
South Dakota 22.9 (+/-2.4%) 34.8 (+/- 7.9%) 26.6 (+/-2.8%) 30.4 (+/- 7.9%)
Tennessee 28.3 (+/-2.5%) 35.9 (+/- 7.4%) 36.1 (+/-2.4%) 42.9 (+/- 5.9%)
Texas 22.4 (+/-2.8%) 35.6 (+/- 6.9%) 24.1 (+/-3.1%) 37.2 (+/- 6.7%)
Utah 13.0 (+/-1.9%) 21.9 (+/- 6.6%) 17.3 (+/-2.3%) 22.2 (+/- 6.4%)
Vermont 22.3 (+/-2.3%) 43.5 (+/- 6.8%) 19.8 (+/-2.1%) 27.9 (+/- 6.0%)
Virginia 22.1 (+/-2.6%) 37.7 (+/- 7.6%) 18.7 (+/-2.5%) 27.0 (+/- 7.3%)
Washington 20.5 (+/-1.8%) 34.5 (+/- 5.5%) 17.0 (+/-1.6%) 19.9 (+/- 4.3%)
West Virginia 26.3 (+/-2.6%) 39.6 (+/- 5.6%) 40.7 (+/-2.7%) 47.5 (+/- 6.0%)
Wisconsin 23.6 (+/-2.6%) 40.3 (+/-10.5%) 22.5 (+/-2.9%) 33.4 (+/-11.3%)
Wyoming 19.4 (+/-2.1%) 39.6 (+/- 5.6%) 19.2 (+/-2.9%) 20.8 (+/- 7.5%)
Range 13.0-28.3 21.9-53.0 14.3-40.7 19.9-56.0
Median 22.8 39.3 25.1 31.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Persons who reported having smoked >=100 cigarettes during their lifetimes and who smoke now.
+ During the preceding 12 months.
& No data were available for the District of Columbia.
@ Confidence interval.
===========================================================================================================================
Return to top. Disclaimer All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].Page converted: 10/05/98 |
| |||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|
