Skip Navigation LinksSkip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Safer Healthier People
Blue White
Blue White
bottom curve
CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z spacer spacer
spacer
Blue curve MMWR spacer
spacer
spacer

Health-Related Quality of Life Among Persons With Epilepsy --- Texas, 1998

Epilepsy is a central nervous system disorder characterized by unprovoked, recurrent seizures that may affect physical, mental, or behavioral functioning (1). In 1995, approximately 2.3 million persons residing in the United States had epilepsy. Approximately 181,000 new cases of epilepsy are diagnosed each year, with annual estimated costs of $12.5 billion in medical care and lost productivity (2,3). Because epilepsy has a substantial impact on health (e.g., physical and psychosocial difficulties, side effects of anticonvulsant therapy, lifestyle restrictions, and perceived stigmatization) (1,4--6), self-reported physical and mental healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) measures are useful in gauging the impact of epilepsy on persons with the disorder. Persons with chronic health disorders are at risk for impaired HRQOL (7). Few studies have examined the HRQOL of persons with epilepsy (5,6), and none has used a representative sample of adults residing in the United States. This report examines data from the 1998 Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) that included a question about epilepsy; findings indicate that persons with epilepsy reported substantially worse HRQOL than persons without epilepsy. Community-based interventions such as the Sepulveda Epilepsy Education Program that address medication self-management, psychosocial self-management, and other education interventions can improve the quality of life for persons with epilepsy (8).

BRFSS is an ongoing, state-based, random-digit--dialed telephone survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population aged >18 years that tracks the prevalence of key health and safety-related behaviors and characteristics (9). BRFSS data are weighted to reflect the age, sex, and racial/ethnic distribution of the state's estimated population during the survey year. The standard survey used in all states includes four self-rated questions: general health status, number of days during the 30 preceding the survey when physical health was not good, number of days during the preceding 30 when mental health was not good, and number of days during the preceding 30 when activity was limited as a result of poor physical or mental health. Unhealthy days are the total number of days when physical and mental health were not good, with the total not to exceed 30 days. In 1998, Texas added an optional quality of life module to its healthy days' measures that asked respondents about the nature of their activity limitations and the number of days of pain, depression, anxiety, insufficient sleep or rest, and overall vitality during the preceding 30 days. One question was added about epilepsy.

Persons with epilepsy were defined as those who reported having been told by a doctor that they had epilepsy or a seizure disorder. The responses to HRQOL questions from 3355 persons residing in Texas were analyzed using sample weights and SUDAAN statistical software to account for the complex survey design.

In Texas in 1998, 52 (1.8%) (95% confidence interval=1.4--2.1) of 3355 respondents reported having epilepsy. These respondents did not differ in age and sex from those without epilepsy. Those with epilepsy reported substantially worse HRQOL than those without epilepsy; 18 (45.9%) respondents with epilepsy reported fair or poor health compared with 570 (18.5%) of 3290 respondents without epilepsy*. Compared with those without epilepsy, respondents with epilepsy reported 4.4 more physically unhealthy days, 5.2 more mentally unhealthy days, 6.4 more overall unhealthy days, 4.0 more recent activity limitation days, 6.8 more days of pain, 5.6 more days of depression, 5.2 more days of anxiety, 3.5 more days of insufficient sleep or rest, and 3.3 fewer days of vitality in the 30 days preceding the survey (Table 1).

Reported by: R Kobau, MPH, Association of Schools of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia. K Condon, Texas Dept of Health. Health Care and Aging Studies Br, Div of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

Editorial Note:

On the basis of HRQOL responses to the 1998 Texas BRFSS questionnaire, respondents with epilepsy had substantially worse HRQOL than respondents without epilepsy based on valid HRQOL measures (10). These findings are comparable with the number of unhealthy days among BRFSS respondents from eight other states with arthritis, heart problems, diabetes, and cancer (7). Additional study is needed to determine whether the high number of reported days with pain in persons with epilepsy is associated with seizure severity, injuries from seizures, unintended effects of anticonvulsant medications, or other factors. The high number of days with depression and anxiety suggests that this population has high levels of anxiety and low levels of life fulfillment (1,5,6).

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, BRFSS excludes persons without telephones, in institutions (e.g., nursing homes and the military), and persons aged <18 years. Second, BRFSS may underrepresent the severely impaired because time and functional capacity are required to participate in BRFSS. Third, it is unclear whether lower levels of HRQOL in persons with epilepsy in this study are a result of the disorder or factors unrelated to epilepsy. Finally, because the sample size of respondents with epilepsy was small, comparisons by sex and racial/ethnic subgroup were limited.

To improve the HRQOL of persons with epilepsy, the International Commission on Outcome Measurement in Epilepsy has recommended further research into the HRQOL among persons with epilepsy (6). In addition, BRFSS and other surveillance systems can provide data on the health status, behaviors, and HRQOL of persons with epilepsy. State and local health departments can collaborate with health-care providers to develop and promote comprehensive and continual care among minorities, children, the elderly, and other underserved populations. Schools, worksites, and places of worship can educate the public to destigmatize epilepsy, and interventions such as the Sepulveda Epilepsy Education Program can improve medication self-management and psychosocial self-management of epilepsy (8).

References

  1. Trimble MR, Dodson WE, eds. Epilepsy and quality of life. New York, New York: Raven Press Ltd., 1994.
  2. Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC. Epilepsy: frequency, causes and consequences. New York, New York: Demos Publications, 1990:1--52.
  3. Begley CE, Famulari M, Annegers JF, et al. The cost of epilepsy in the United States: an estimate from population-based clinical and survey data. Epilepsia 2000;41:342--51.
  4. Devinsky O, Penry JK. Quality of life in epilepsy: the clinician's view. Epilepsia 1993;34:S4--S7.
  5. Collings JA. Psychosocial well-being and epilepsy: an empirical study. Epilepsia 1990;31:418--26.
  6. Baker GA, Camfield C, Camfield P, et al. Commission on outcome measurement in epilepsy, 1994--1997: final report. Epilepsia 1998;39:213--31.
  7. CDC. Health-related quality of life and activity limitation---eight states, 1995. MMWR 1998;47:135--40.
  8. Hegelson DC, Mittan R, Tan SY, Chayashirisobhon S. Sepulveda epilepsy education: the efficacy of a psychoeducational treatment program in treating medical and psychosocial aspects of epilepsy. Epilepsia 1990;31:75--86.
  9. CDC. Health risks in America: gaining insight from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Revised ed. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 1997.
  10. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality of life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:877--84.

*Thirteen persons without epilepsy did not answer, refused to answer, or were unsure about answering the question about general health status.


Table 1

Table 1
Return to top.

Disclaimer   All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].

Page converted: 1/18/2001

HOME  |  ABOUT MMWR  |  MMWR SEARCH  |  DOWNLOADS  |  RSSCONTACT
POLICY  |  DISCLAIMER  |  ACCESSIBILITY

Safer, Healthier People

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd, MailStop E-90, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A

USA.GovDHHS

Department of Health
and Human Services

This page last reviewed 5/2/01