Notes from the Field: Injuries Associated with Bison Encounters — Yellowstone National Park, 2015

Cara Cherry, DVM1,2; Kirsten Leong, PhD3; Rick Wallen, MS4; Danielle Buttke, DVM, PhD2 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation
Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

Since 1980, bison have injured more pedestrian visitors to Yellowstone National Park (Yellowstone) than any other animal (1). After the occurrence of 33 bison-related injuries during 1983–1985 (range = 10–13/year), the park implemented successful outreach campaigns (1) to reduce the average number of injuries to 0.8/year (range = 0–2/year) during 2010–2014 (unpublished data, National Park Service, September 2015). During May–July 2015, five injuries associated with bison encounters occurred (Table). Case reports were reviewed to evaluate circumstances surrounding these injuries to inform prevention.

American bison (Bison bison) are the largest terrestrial mammals in the Western Hemisphere (2). Yellowstone is home to the largest U.S. bison population on public land, with an estimated 4,900 bison in July 2015 (3). Mating season occurs during July–September, coinciding with Yellowstone’s peak tourism season. Mature bull aggressiveness increases during mating season (2). Yellowstone promulgates regulations that prohibit visitors from “willfully approaching, remaining, viewing, or engaging in any activity within 300 ft (91 m) of bears or wolves, or within 75 ft (23 m) of any other wildlife, including nesting birds, or within any distance that disturbs, displaces or otherwise interferes with the free unimpeded movement of wildlife, or creates or contributes to a potentially hazardous condition or situation” (4,5). Yellowstone conducts extensive education campaigns to warn visitors of the dangers of approaching wildlife and inform visitors on the required viewing distances. A graphic flyer is distributed at park entrances, and signs are present throughout campgrounds, developed areas, along roadsides, and in the visitor centers.

The five persons injured during 2015 (four Yellowstone visitors and one employee) ranged in age from 16 to 68 years (median = 43 years); four were female. Every incident occurred in developed areas, such as hiking trails or geyser basins. Two persons were gored, and three were tossed into the air. Four persons required hospitalization, three of whom were transported by helicopter ambulance. There were no deaths.

All encounters resulted from failure to maintain the required distance of 75 ft (23 m) from bison. Four injuries occurred when three or more persons approached the bison. Two persons were injured while walking on hiking trails. Three persons sustained injuries while taking photographs at a distance of approximately 3–6 ft (1–2 m) from bison, including two who turned their back on the bison to take the photograph; one person reported taking a cell phone self-portrait (selfie), which necessitated getting close to the animal.

During 1980–1999, a total of 10 of 35 bison encounters (29%) involved photography (1); the majority of persons were ≥10 ft (3 m) from the bison, unlike the 3–6 ft (1–2 m) reported with recent photography-related injuries. Smart phones now meet the needs of most casual photographers. Smart phones are owned by 64% of American adults, and 67% of smart phone owners report using their phone to share pictures and videos (6). The popularity of smart phone photography with its limited zoom capacity and social media sharing of selfies might explain why visitors disregard park regulations and approach wildlife more closely than when traditional camera technology was used. Educating visitors about wildlife behavior and the need to maintain distances of 75–300 ft (23–91 m) from wildlife for safety of persons and wildlife is critical. Injury prevention campaigns that identify and target the underlying motivations of visitors to not comply with viewing distances might prevent future injuries.

Acknowledgments

Kerrie Evans, Yellowstone National Park; Margaret Wild, DVM, PhD, National Park Service, Wildlife Health Branch; Glenn Plumb, PhD, National Park Service, Wildlife Conservation Branch; Jennifer Proctor, PE, National Park Service, Office of Risk Management; David Wong, MD, National Park Service, Office of Public Health; Jennifer Wright, DVM, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, CDC.

Corresponding author: Cara Cherry, [email protected], 970-267-7230.


1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Office of Public Health and Wildlife Health Branch, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science, National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado; 3Human Dimensions of Biological Resource Management, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science, National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado,4Bison Ecology and Management Team, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.

References

  1. Oliff T, Caslick J. Wildlife-human conflicts in Yellowstone, when animals and people get too close. Yellowstone Science 2003;11:18–22.
  2. Plumb GE, White PJ, Aune K. American bison Bison bison (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Melletti, M, Burton, J, eds. Ecology, evolution, and behaviour of wild cattle: implications for conservation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p.83–114.
  3. Geremia C, Wallen R, White PJ. Population dynamics and adaptive management of Yellowstone bison. Mammoth Hot Springs, WY: Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service; 2015. http://www.ibmp.info/Library/OpsPlans/2016_BisonRemovalRecommendations_NPS.pdf
  4. Yellowstone National Park. Superintendent’s compendium of designations, closures, permit requirements and other restrictions imposed under discretionary authority. Mammoth Hot Springs, WY: Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service; 2014. http://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/management/upload/YELL_Supt_Comp_2014_June20_Final.pdf
  5. Wildlife protection. 36 C.F.R. Sect. 2.2 (1983). http://www.nps.gov/goga/planyourvisit/upload/36%20CFR%202.2.pdf
  6. Smith A, McGeeney K, Duggan M, Rainie L, Keeter SUS. Smartphone use in 2015. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/03/PI_Smartphones_0401151.pdf
Return to your place in the textTABLE. Injuries associated with bison encounters — Yellowstone National Park, 2015
Age Sex Park affiliation Activity Distance from bison Encounter type Injuries
16 Female Visitor Photography; turned back to bison 3–6 ft Gored Serious
62 Male Visitor Photography 3–5 ft Tossed Serious
19 Female Employee Walking; did not observe bison 10 ft Tossed Minor
68 Female Visitor Walking; observed bison and continued to walk past NA Gored Serious
43 Female Visitor Photography; turned back to bison 6 ft Tossed Minor

Abbreviation: NA = not available.


Suggested citation for this article: Cherry C, Leong K, Wallen R, Buttke D. Notes from the Field. Injuries Associated with Bison Encounters — Yellowstone National Park, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:293–294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6511a5.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].

View Page In: PDF [260K]