Current and Binge Drinking Among High School Students — United States, 1991–2015

Excessive drinking accounted for approximately 4,300 deaths each year among persons aged <21 years during 2006–2010,* and underage drinking cost the United States $24.3 billion in 2010 (1). CDC analyzed data from the national Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) for the years 1991–2015 to examine trends in drinking by U.S. high school students, and from the 2015 YRBS to assess the usual source of alcohol consumed^† and binge drinking intensity (i.e., the average number of drinks consumed per binge drinking occasion).^§ During 1991–2007, the prevalence of current drinking^¶ among high school students declined significantly, from 50.8% (1991) to 44.7% (2007), and then significantly declined to 32.8% in 2015. The prevalence of binge drinking** increased from 31.3% in 1991 to 31.5% in 1999, and then significantly declined to 17.7% in 2015. Most high school students who drank were binge drinkers (57.8%), and 43.8% of binge drinkers consumed eight or more drinks in a row. Despite progress, current drinking and binge drinking are common among high school students, and many students who binge drink do so at high intensity (i.e., eight or more drinks in a row). Widespread use of evidence-based strategies for preventing excessive drinking (e.g., increasing alcohol taxes, regulating alcohol outlet density, and having commercial host liability laws) could help reduce underage drinking and related harms.^††

The national YRBS is a cross-sectional, biennial school-based survey of 9th–12th grade students in U.S. public and private schools that monitors the prevalence of health risk behaviors. During 1991–2015, a three-stage cluster sample design was used to select nationally representative samples of students; sample sizes ranged from 10,904 to 16,410. During each cycle, students completed an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. Response rates ranged from 60% to 71%. Data were weighted to account for oversampling of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic students and nonresponse, and to produce national estimates of health risk behaviors among U.S. high school students who attend public or private schools. Details of the YRBS methodology have been published previously.^§§

Current drinking was defined as consuming one or more alcoholic drink on ≥1 days during the past 30 days. Binge drinking was defined as consuming five or more alcoholic drinks in a row on ≥1 days during the past 30 days. The usual source of alcohol and binge drinking intensity also were assessed. The prevalence of current drinking was calculated among students overall. The prevalence of binge drinking was calculated among students overall and current drinkers. The usual source of alcohol and binge drinking intensity were calculated among current drinkers only.

Data from 1991–2015 were used to examine trends in current drinking, binge drinking, and binge drinking among current drinkers, adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, and grade. Trends were analyzed using logistic regression models and interaction terms. Time was modeled as a continuous variable^¶¶ with linear and nonlinear (quadratic) components, which were considered significant at p-values <0.05. Joinpoint software*** was used, when significant quadratic trends were found, to determine the year in which the trend changed direction or leveled off. Percentage-point changes were calculated to compare the magnitude of trends, but differences between subgroups were not tested for significance. Data from 2015 were used to assess the prevalence of drinking patterns overall and by sociodemographic characteristics, using pairwise t-tests to assess differences by subgroup. Respondents who had missing information were excluded from analyses.^††† The sample sizes presented are unweighted and the percentages are weighted.

The overall prevalence of current drinking among U.S. high school students declined significantly from 50.8% in 1991 to 44.7% in 2007, then further declined to 32.8% in 2015 (Figure 1). Trend analysis indicated that the prevalence of binge drinking increased from 31.3% in 1991 to 31.5% in 1999, then declined significantly to 17.7% in 2015. From 1991 to 2015, the percentage-point decline in the prevalence of current and binge drinking was greater among male students (current drinking declined 20.5 percentage points, and binge drinking declined 17.9 percentage points) than female students (current drinking declined 15.3 percentage points, and binge drinking declined 9.1 percentage points).

The prevalence of binge drinking among current drinkers increased significantly from 62.2% in 1991 to 66.6% in 1997, then declined significantly to 57.8% in 2015 (Figure 2). Among male current drinkers, the prevalence of binge drinking declined significantly from 69.9% in 1991 to 61.5% in 2015. Among female current drinkers, the prevalence of binge drinking increased from 53.5% in 1991 to 60.4% in 1997, then declined to 54.0% in 2015.

In 2015, the prevalence of current drinking increased significantly with school grade from 23.4% among 9th grade students to 42.4% among 12th grade students, as did the prevalence of binge drinking, which was 10.4% among 9th grade students and 24.6% among 12th grade students (Table). Similarly, the prevalence of binge drinking among current drinkers increased significantly with school grade from 47.0% (9th grade students) to 61.9% (12th grade students). The prevalence of current and binge drinking was significantly higher among non-Hispanic white and Hispanic students than among non-Hispanic black students. The prevalence of binge drinking among current drinkers was also significantly higher among non-Hispanic white than among non-Hispanic black students.

In 2015, 36.4% of binge drinkers and 55.7% of current drinkers who did not binge drink usually obtained alcohol from someone who gave it to them. Binge drinkers were more than three times more likely than current drinkers who did not binge drink to give someone money to purchase alcohol (30.7% compared with 8.8%) and to purchase alcohol themselves (8.8% compared with 2.8%). Among binge drinkers, 43.8% consumed eight or more drinks in a row. Among binge drinkers, the prevalence of consuming eight or more drinks in a row was significantly higher among male (50.5%) than female (35.3%) students.

Corresponding author: Marissa B. Esser, [email protected], 770-488-5463.

¹Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; ²Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, CDC.

References

1. Sacks JJ, Gonzales KR, Bouchery EE, Tomedi LE, Brewer RD. 2010 national and state costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am J Prev Med 2015;49:e73–9. CrossRef PubMed
2. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use: 1975–2014. Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor. MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2015.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: detailed tables. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2015.
4. Nelson TF, Xuan Z, Blanchette JG, Heeren TC, Naimi TS. Patterns of change in implementation of state alcohol control policies in the United States, 1999–2011. Addiction 2015;110:59–68. CrossRef PubMed
5. Serdula MK, Brewer RD, Gillespie C, Denny CH, Mokdad A. Trends in alcohol use and binge drinking, 1985–1999: results of a multi-state survey. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:294–8. CrossRef PubMed
6. Harding FM, Hingson RW, Klitzner M, et al. Underage drinking: a review of trends and prevention strategies. Am J Prev Med 2016;51(Suppl 2):S148–57. CrossRef PubMed
7. Nelson DE, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Nelson HA. State alcohol-use estimates among youth and adults, 1993–2005. Am J Prev Med 2009;36:218–24. CrossRef PubMed
8. Xuan Z, Blanchette JG, Nelson TF, et al. Youth drinking in the United States: relationships with alcohol policies and adult drinking. Pediatrics 2015;136:18–27. CrossRef PubMed
9. Chavez PR, Nelson DE, Naimi TS, Brewer RD. Impact of a new gender-specific definition for binge drinking on prevalence estimates for women. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:468–71. CrossRef PubMed
10. Ross CS, Brewer RD, Jernigan DH. The potential impact of a “no-buy” list on youth exposure to alcohol advertising on cable television. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2016;77:7–16. CrossRef PubMed

FIGURE 1. Prevalence of self-reported current drinking* and binge drinking^† among high school students, by sex — Youth Risk Behavior Surveys, United States, 1991–2015

* One or more drinks of alcohol on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.

^† Five or more drinks in a row (i.e., within a couple of hours) on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.

The figure above is line graph showing the prevalence of self-reported current drinking and binge drinking among male and female high school students in the United States, during the years 1991 to 2015.

FIGURE 2. Prevalence of self-reported binge drinking* among high school students who reported current drinking,^† by sex — Youth Risk Behavior Surveys, United States, 1991–2015

* Five or more drinks in a row (i.e., within a couple of hours) on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.

^† One or more drinks of alcohol on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.

The figure above is a line graph showing the prevalence of self-reported binge drinking among male and female high school students in the United States who reported current drinking during the years 1991 to 2015.

TABLE. Weighted percentage of high school students who used alcohol, by selected characteristics — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2015

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.
* Had one or more drinks of alcohol on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.
^† Had five or more drinks in a row (i.e., within a couple of hours) on ≥1 days during the 30 days before the survey.
^§ Significantly different from female students.
^¶ Significantly different from 11th grade students.
** Significantly different from 12th grade students.
^†† Significantly different from 10th grade students.
^§§ Significantly different from non-Hispanic black students.
^¶¶ Significantly different from Hispanic students.