HIV Partner Service Delivery Among Transgender Women — United States, 2013–2017

Weekly / January 17, 2020 / 69(2);35–39

Print
Related Pages

Wei Song, PhD1; Mesfin S. Mulatu, PhD1; Shubha Rao, MPH1; Guoshen Wang, MS1; Hui Zhang Kudon, MPH1; Kevin O’Connor, MA2 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

An overall estimate of prevalence of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was 18.8% among transgender women based on a meta-analysis of studies in the United States conducted during 2006–2017.

What is added by this report?

During 2013–2017, 71.5% of index transgender women were interviewed for partner services, 71.2% of transgender women partners were notified of their potential HIV exposure, 46.5% were tested for HIV, and 18.6% received a new diagnosis of HIV-positivity.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Providing partner services to index transgender women and transgender women partners requires additional efforts to address the social and structural barriers unique to this population, provide timely prevention services, help reduce HIV transmission, and end the HIV epidemic in the United States.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Metric Details
Tables

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Related Materials

Transgender women* in the United States are disproportionately affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because of multiple factors, including stigma related to gender identity, unstable housing, limited employment options, and high-risk behaviors, such as sex work, unprotected receptive anal intercourse, and injection drug use, that tend to increase their vulnerability to becoming infected with HIV (1,2). In a recent meta-analysis of 88 U.S. studies conducted during 2006–2017, the mean estimated laboratory-confirmed prevalence of HIV infection among transgender women was 14.2%, and the mean self-reported prevalence estimate was 21.0% (3). The Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative calls for accelerating the implementation of evidence-based strategies in the right geographic areas targeted to the right persons to end the HIV epidemic in the United States (4). HIV partner services are effective strategies offered by public health workers to persons with a diagnosis of HIV infection (index persons) and their sex or needle-sharing partners (partners), who are notified of potential HIV exposure and offered HIV testing and related services. CDC analyzed HIV partner services data submitted by 61 health departments† during 2013–2017. Among 208,304 index persons, 1,727 (0.8%) were transgender women. Overall, 71.5% of index transgender women were interviewed for partner services, which was lower than that for all index persons combined (81.1%). Among 1,089 transgender women named as partners by index persons, 71.2% were notified of potential HIV exposure, which was lower than that for all partners combined (77.1%). Fewer than half (46.5%) of notified transgender women partners were tested for HIV, and approximately one in five (18.6%) of those who were tested received a new diagnosis of HIV infection, slightly higher than for all partners combined (17.6%). Additional efforts are needed to effectively implement partner services among transgender women and identify those whose infection with HIV is undiagnosed, provide timely prevention and care services, reduce HIV transmission, and contribute to ending the HIV epidemic.

During 2013–2017, CDC funded 61 state and local health departments to implement comprehensive HIV prevention programs, including partner services. CDC analyzed HIV partner services person-level data for transgender women, identified using self-reported sex at birth and current gender identity. Data were stratified by age group, race/ethnicity, and U.S. Census region.§ Index persons are eligible for partner services if they live within the jurisdiction at the time of report. During partner services interviews, index persons can provide information about their sex or needle-sharing partners. Named partners are eligible for partner services if there is sufficient information to locate and notify them of their potential HIV exposure. Partners with newly diagnosed HIV infection are defined as those who test positive for HIV through partner services–initiated HIV testing and have no evidence of a previous diagnosis of HIV infection. Partners with previously diagnosed HIV infection should have evidence of an HIV diagnosis from cross-check with the health department surveillance system, review of laboratory reports, medical records, other available data sources (e.g., partner services database), or patient self-report. Data on index persons and partners were extracted from index person and partner information–specific databases; index persons could not be directly linked with their named partners. The outcomes for this analysis are the percentage of index transgender women interviewed for partner services and the percentage of transgender women partners notified and tested for HIV, and who newly or previously received a diagnosis of infection with HIV. Multivariate binomial regression was used to assess the association between index person or partner characteristics and partner services outcomes. However, because of the small number of partners with newly or previously diagnosed HIV infection, associations between partner characteristics and diagnosis of infection with HIV were not analyzed. SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) was used to conduct all analyses.

Among the 208,304 index persons reported to CDC during 2013–2017, 81.1% overall were interviewed for partner services (Table 1). Among all index persons, 1,727 (0.8%) were identified as transgender women, among whom 71.5% were interviewed for partner services. Compared with transgender women aged 13–24 years, those aged ≥35 years were less likely to be interviewed for partner services (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] for persons aged 35–44 years = 0.86; ≥45 years = 0.82). Compared with transgender women residing in the Northeast, those residing in the Midwest (aPR = 1.18) and in the South (aPR = 1.15) were more likely, and those residing in the West (aPR = 0.75) were less likely to be interviewed for partner services.

Among partners identified in partner services interviews, 132,938 with sufficient information for follow-up were reported to CDC during 2013–2017 (Table 2), 102,500 (77.1%) of whom were notified. Transgender women partners with sufficient information for follow-up accounted for 1,089 (0.8%), among whom, 775 (71.2%) were notified of their potential HIV exposure. Compared with transgender women partners aged 13–24 years, those aged ≥25 years were less likely to be notified (aPR for 25–34 years = 0.88; 35–44 years = 0.79; ≥45 years = 0.77); compared with transgender women partners who were non-Hispanic white (white), those who were non-Hispanic black (black) were less likely to be notified (aPR = 0.89). Transgender women partners residing in the South and the West U.S. Census regions were more likely to be notified than those residing in the Northeast (aPR = 2.00 and aPR = 1.35, respectively).

Among all 102,500 notified partners, 50.8% (52,071) were tested for HIV, among whom 9,146 (17.6%) received a new diagnosis of HIV infection (Table 3). Overall, 0.76% (775) of notified partners were transgender women, among whom 360 (46.5%) were tested for HIV; 67 (18.6%) of these women received a new diagnosis of HIV infection, and 18 (5.0%) had a previous diagnosis of infection with HIV. The highest testing percentages among transgender women partners were in those aged 25–34 years (52.5%), Hispanics/Latinos (51.0%), and residents of the Midwest (71.4%) Census regions (excluding U.S. dependent areas). Compared with transgender women partners who were white, those who were black were less likely to be tested for HIV (aPR = 0.83).

Top

Discussion

This analysis found that the percentage of index transgender women interviewed by CDC-funded health departments was lower (71.5%) than that for all index persons combined (81.1%). There were also significant regional and age group differences among index transgender women interviewed. The percentage of transgender women partners notified of their potential HIV exposure (71.2%) was lower than that for all partners combined (77.1%), suggesting that there are missed opportunities to improve health of transgender women and to interrupt onward transmission of HIV.

Although 46.5% of transgender women partners were tested for HIV, this represented an improvement compared with the 35.6% ever testing and 10.0% past-year testing among transgender women found in an analysis of 2014–2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance data from 27 states and Guam (5) and was similar to the percentage of transgender women tested for HIV during the past 12 months (53.5%) through CDC-funded community-based organizations in three cities in 2008 (6). HIV testing is the gateway to other HIV-related services, and low rates of testing limit opportunities for timely linkage to care and prevention services (7).

Among transgender women partners who were tested, approximately one in five (18.6%) received a new diagnosis of HIV infection. This is consistent with an overall estimate of self-reported and laboratory-confirmed HIV prevalence of 18.8% among transgender women found in a meta-analysis of U.S. studies (3) and 19% pooled prevalence from 14 countries (8). Among transgender women partners with HIV-positive test results, 64.2% were aged ≤34 years, 56.7% were black, and 56.7% resided in the South. These findings are similar to those from the National HIV Surveillance System during 2009–2014, in which 72.6% of transgender women with HIV-positive test results were aged ≤34 years, 50.8% were black, and 42.8% resided in the South at the time of their diagnosis (9). Previous studies have attributed the higher levels of diagnosis of infection with HIV among transgender women, compared with those among other genders, to individual, social, and structural factors, including higher levels of sexual and drug use risk behaviors, gender and HIV-related stigma, homelessness, and mental health and substance use disorders (1,2).

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, these analyses are based on HIV partner services program data reported from CDC-funded health departments and might not be generalizable to HIV partner services among all transgender women nationally. Second, the partners in the current analysis are those for whom sufficient information to be contacted by partner services programs was available and not all partners named by index persons. Third, the percentage of persons with newly diagnosed infection with HIV might be overestimated in jurisdictions that do not routinely check surveillance records to identify persons with previous diagnoses. Finally, health departments differ in implementation of partner services, which can contribute to varying data completeness and comparability.

Full and effective implementation of partner services programs is important to identify persons who are unaware of their HIV status. Partner services is a successful strategy for identifying persons with undiagnosed infection with HIV. However, the percentage of index person interview or partner notification for transgender women are lower than the national average for all genders combined. Approximately half of notified transgender women partners were tested for HIV. Efforts to address social and structural barriers to effective implementation of partner services among transgender women, including client concerns about compromised confidentiality and fear of negative impacts (e.g., abuse, stigmatization, medical mistrust, and abandonment), would improve partner services delivery in this disproportionately affected population (2,10). To that end, CDC has been supporting a variety of strategies, including conducting prevention research to identify evidence-based interventions that focus on transgender women, funding HIV prevention projects that prioritize transgender persons, and developing social media and marketing campaigns that promote HIV testing, prevention, and treatment among transgender persons (1). HIV prevention programs tailored to the needs of transgender women, particularly transgender women who are black, aged ≤35 years, and residing in the South, could help to reduce onward HIV transmission, increase linkage to HIV medical care and prevention, reduce HIV-related health disparities, and contribute to ending the HIV epidemic in the United States.

Top

Acknowledgments

Janet Heitgerd, Lisa Kimbrough, Michele Rorie, Program Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; Arlene Edwards, Capacity Building Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; Prevention Program Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; Quantitative Sciences and Data Management Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC.

Top

Corresponding author: Wei Song, [email protected], 404–639–6324.

Top

1Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; 2Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC.

Top

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Top


* Transgender persons are those whose current gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. In this analysis, transgender women included those who identified themselves as “male-to-female transgender” or those who identified “male” as their sex assigned at birth and “female” as their current gender.

† Fifty states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and eight directly funded metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) or specified metropolitan divisions: Baltimore, Chicago, Fulton County (Atlanta), Houston, Los Angeles County, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco.

§ U.S. Census regions (states and MSAs): Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York City (New York), Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Vermont, and Rhode Island. Midwest: Illinois, Chicago (Illinois), Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Atlanta (Georgia), Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Baltimore (Maryland), Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Los Angeles (California), San Francisco (California), Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming; U.S. dependent areas: Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.

Top

References

  1. CDC. HIV and transgender people. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/group/gender/transgender/cdc-hiv-transgender-factsheet.pdf
  2. Reback CJ, Ferlito D, Kisler KA, Fletcher JB. Recruiting, linking, and retaining high-risk transgender women into HIV prevention and care services: an overview of barriers, strategies, and lessons learned. Int J Transgenderism 2015;16:209–21. CrossRef PubMed
  3. Becasen JS, Denard CL, Mullins MM, Higa DH, Sipe TA. Estimating the prevalence of HIV and sexual behaviors among the US transgender population: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2006–2017. Am J Public Health 2018;109:e1–8. CrossRef PubMed
  4. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA 2019;321:844–5. CrossRef PubMed
  5. Pitasi MA, Oraka E, Clark H, Town M, DiNenno EA. HIV testing among transgender women and men—27 states and Guam, 2014–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:883–7. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Schulden JD, Song B, Barros A, et al. Rapid HIV testing in transgender communities by community-based organizations in three cities. Public Health Rep 2008;123(Suppl 3):101–14. CrossRef PubMed
  7. CDC. HIV testing in the United States. Factsheet. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/hiv-testing-us-508.pdf
  8. Baral SD, Poteat T, Strömdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:214–22. CrossRef PubMed
  9. Clark H, Babu AS, Wiewel EW, Opoku J, Crepaz N. Diagnosed HIV infection in transgender adults and adolescents: results from the National HIV Surveillance System, 2009–2014. AIDS Behav 2017;21:2774–83. CrossRef PubMed
  10. Golub SA, Gamarel KE. The impact of anticipated HIV stigma on delays in HIV testing behaviors: findings from a community-based sample of men who have sex with men and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013;27:621–7. CrossRef PubMed

Top

TABLE 1. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive transgender women who were interviewed for partner services, by demographic characteristics — United States,* 2013–2017Return to your place in the text
Characteristic All index persons Index transgender women
Total, no. Interviewed, no. (column %) % Interviewed Total, no. (%) Interviewed, no. (column %) % Interviewed aPR (95% CI)
Total 208,304 168,977 (100.0) 81.1 1,727 (100.0) 1,234 (100.0) 71.5 –
Age group (yrs)†
13–24 31,005 26,809 (15.9) 86.5 364 (21.1) 298 (24.2) 81.9 Reference
25–34 64,870 53,284 (31.5) 82.1 721 (41.8) 538 (43.6) 74.6 0.95 (0.89–1.01)
35–44 42,377 33,346 (19.7) 78.7 371 (21.5) 236 (19.1) 63.6 0.86 (0.78–0.94)**
≥45 62,029 48,827 (28.9) 78.7 269 (15.6) 162 (13.1) 60.2 0.82 (0.73–0.91)**
Race/Ethnicity§
White, non-Hispanic 60,649 46,513 (27.5) 76.7 205 (11.9) 127 (10.3) 62.0 Reference
Black, non-Hispanic 88,878 76,198 (45.1) 85.7 890 (51.5) 694 (56.2) 78.0 1.09 (0.98–1.22)
Hispanic/Latino 42,460 34,417 (20.4) 81.1 453 (26.2) 301 (24.4) 66.4 1.09 (0.96–1.24)
Others, non-Hispanic 6,325 4,739 (2.8) 74.9 100 (5.8) 69 (5.6) 69.0 1.18 (1.00–1.14)
U.S. Census region
Northeast 26,658 23,442 (13.9) 87.9 410 (23.7) 301 (24.4) 73.4 Reference
Midwest 26,678 23,656 (14.0) 88.7 160 (9.3) 140 (11.4) 87.5 1.18 (1.08–1.28)**
South 110,039 95,961 (56.8) 87.2 596 (34.5) 497 (40.3) 83.4 1.15 (1.07–1.23)**
West 43,163 24,167 (14.3) 56.0 559 (32.4) 294 (23.8) 52.6 0.75 (0.67–0.83)**
U.S. dependent areas 1,766 1,751 (1.04) 99.2 2 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 100.0 –

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio for each binomial relationship controlling for other characteristics in the model; CI = confidence interval; MSA = metropolitan statistical area.
* Includes U.S. dependent areas of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
† Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All index persons” for number of total (8,023; 3.9%) and number of interviewed (6,711; 4.0%) and in the column “Transgender women index persons” for number of total (2; 0.1%).
§ Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All index persons” for number of total (9,992; 4.8%) and number of interviewed (7,110; 4.2%) and in the column “Index transgender women” for number of total (79; 4.6%) and number of interviewed (43; 3.5%).
U.S. Census regions (states and MSAs): Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York City (New York), Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Vermont, and Rhode Island. Midwest: Illinois, Chicago (Illinois), Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Atlanta (Georgia), Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Baltimore (Maryland), Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Los Angeles (California), San Francisco (California), Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming; U.S. dependent areas: Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.
** p<0.001.

Top

TABLE 2. Partner notification services delivery among transgender women partners, by demographic characteristics — United States,* 2013–2017Return to your place in the text
Characteristic All partners Transgender women partners
Total, no. Notified (column %) % Notified Total, no. (%) Notified (column %) % Notified aPR (95% CI)
Total 132,938 102,500 (100.0) 77.1 1,089 (100.0) 775 (100.0) 71.2 –
Age group (yrs)†
13–24 21,502 17,717 (17.3) 82.4 217 (19.9) 180 (23.2) 82.9 Reference
25–34 41,969 33,749 (32.9) 80.4 356 (32.7) 259 (33.4) 72.8 0.88 (0.81–0.95)††
35–44 22,936 17,957 (17.5) 78.3 195 (17.9) 123 (15.9) 63.1 0.79 (0.70–0.89)**
≥45 27,088 20,998 (20.5) 77.5 165 (15.2) 99 (12.8) 60.0 0.77 (0.68–0.88)**
Race/Ethnicity§
White, non-Hispanic 38,622 29,528 (28.8) 76.5 245 (22.5) 193 (24.9) 78.8 Reference
Black, non-Hispanic 53,805 42,715 (41.7) 79.4 601 (55.2) 437 (56.4) 72.7 0.89 (0.81–0.97)††
Hispanic/Latino 24,593 19,615 (19.1) 79.8 172 (15.8) 102 (13.2) 59.3 0.93 (0.80–1.07)
Others, non-Hispanic 3,456 2,539 (2.5) 73.5 21(1.9) 10 (1.3) 47.6 0.90 (0.60–1.36)
U.S. Census region
Northeast 19,495 11,420 (11.1) 58.6 151 (13.9) 58 (7.5) 38.4 Reference
Midwest 14,291 8,185 (8.0) 57.3 26 (2.4) 14 (1.8) 53.8 1.43 (0.94–2.19)
South 71,459 65,640 (64.0) 91.9 766 (70.3) 629 (81.2) 82.1 2.00 (1.61–2.47)**
West 25,614 15,470 (15.1) 60.4 145 (13.3) 73 (9.4) 47.4 1.35 (1.03–1.76)††
U.S. dependent areas 2,079 1,785 (1.7) 85.9 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 100.0 –

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio for each binomial relationship controlling for other characteristics in the model; CI = confidence interval; MSA = metropolitan statistical area.
* Includes U.S. dependent areas of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
† Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All partners” for number of total (19,443; 14.6%) and number of notified (12,079; 11.8%) and in the column “Transgender women partners” for number of total (156; 14.3%) and number of notified (114; 14.7%).
§ Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All partners” for number of total (12,462; 9.4%) and number of notified (8,103; 7.9%) and in the column “Transgender women partners” for number of total (50; 4.6%) and number of notified (33; 4.3%).
U.S. Census regions (states and MSAs): Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York City (New York), Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Vermont, and Rhode Island. Midwest: Illinois, Chicago (Illinois), Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Atlanta (Georgia), Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Baltimore (Maryland), Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Los Angeles (California), San Francisco (California), Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming; U.S. dependent areas: Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.
** p<0.001.
†† p<0.05.

Top

TABLE 3. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and HIV positivity among transgender women partners, by demographic characteristics — United States,* 2013–2017Return to your place in the text
Characteristic All notified partners Notified transgender women partners
Notified, no. Tested, no. (%) Newly diagnosed HIV infection Notified, no. Tested, no. (%) aPR (95% CI) Newly diagnosed HIV infection Previously diagnosed HIV infection
No. (column %) Row % No. (column %) Row % No. (%)
Total 102,500 52,071 (50.8) 9,146 (100.0) 17.6 775 360 (46.5) — 67 (100.0) 18.6 18 (5.0)
Age group (yrs)†
13–24 17,717 10,580 (59.7) 1,769 (19.3) 16.7 180 90 (50.0) Reference 20 (29.9) 22.2 6 (6.7)
25–34 33,749 18,094 (53.6) 3,075 (33.6) 17.0 259 136 (52.5) 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 23 (34.3) 16.9 9 (6.6)
35–44 17,957 9,690 (54.0) 1,725 (18.9) 17.8 123 56 (45.5) 0.90 (0.70–1.15) 10 (14.9) 17.9 2 (3.6)
≥45 20,998 10,838 (51.6) 2,258 (24.7) 20.8 99 49 (49.5) 0.95 (0.74–1.23) 9 (13.4) 18.4 1 (2.0)
Race/Ethnicity§
White, non-Hispanic 29,528 15,607 (52.9) 2,520 (27.6) 16.1 193 95 (49.2) Reference 14 (20.9) 14.7 2 (2.1)
Black, non-Hispanic 42,715 21,658 (50.7) 4,666 (51.0) 21.5 437 193 (44.2) 0.83 (0.69–0.99)** 38 (56.7) 19.7 13 (6.7)
Hispanic/Latino 19,615 10,240 (52.2) 1,374 (15.0) 13.4 102 52 (51.0) 0.97 (0.75–1.26) 12 (17.9) 23.1 3 (5.8)
Others, non-Hispanic 2,539 1,286 (50.6) 200 (2.2) 15.6 10 4 (40.0) 0.60 (0.25–1.46) 1 (1.5) 25.0 0 (0.0)
U.S. Census region
Northeast 11,420 4,245 (37.2) 707 (7.7) 16.7 58 30 (51.7) Reference 13 (19.4) 43.3 2 (6.7)
Midwest 8,185 4,342 (53.0) 884 (9.7) 20.4 14 10 (71.4) 1.31 (0.85–2.04) 6 (9.0) 60.0 0 (—)
South 65,640 34,122 (52.0) 6,465 (70.7) 18.9 629 286 (45.5) 0.91 (0.71–1.17) 38 (56.7) 13.3 14 (4.9)
West 15,470 8,294 (53.6) 978 (10.7) 11.8 73 33 (45.2) 0.78 (0.53–1.13) 9 (13.4) 27.3 2 (6.1)
U.S. dependent areas 1,785 1,068 (59.8) 112 (1.2) 10.5 1 1 (100.0) — 1 (1.5) 100.0 0 (—)

Abbreviations: aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio for each binomial relationship controlling for other characteristics in the model; CI = confidence interval; MSA = metropolitan statistical area.
* Includes U.S. dependent areas of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
† Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All notified partners” for number of notified (12,079; 11.8%), number of tested (2,869; 5.5%), number of newly diagnosed HIV (319; 3.5%) and in the column “Notified transgender women partners) for number of notified (114; 14.7%), number of tested (29; 8.1%), number of newly diagnosed HIV (5; 7.5%).
§ Because of missing/invalid data, records were excluded in the column “All notified partners” for number of notified (8,103; 7.9%), number of tested (3,280; 6.3%), number of newly diagnosed HIV (386; 4.2%) and in the column “Notified transgender women partners” for number of notified (33; 4.3%), number of tested (16; 4.4%), number of newly diagnosed HIV (2; 3.0%).
U.S. Census regions (states and MSAs): Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York City (New York), Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Vermont, and Rhode Island. Midwest: Illinois, Chicago (Illinois), Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Atlanta (Georgia), Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Baltimore (Maryland), Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Texas, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Los Angeles (California), San Francisco (California), Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming; U.S. dependent areas: Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.
** p<0.05.

Top


Suggested citation for this article: Song W, Mulatu MS, Rao S, Wang G, Kudon HZ, O’Connor K. HIV Partner Service Delivery Among Transgender Women — United States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:35–39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6902a3.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].

View Page In: PDF [114K]