Clinical Use of Tecovirimat (Tpoxx) for Treatment of Monkeypox Under an Investigational New Drug Protocol — United States, May–August 2022

Currently, no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved treatments for human monkeypox are available. Tecovirimat (Tpoxx), however, is an antiviral drug that has demonstrated efficacy in animal studies and is FDA-approved for treating smallpox. Use of tecovirimat for treatment of monkeypox in the United States is permitted only through an FDA-regulated Expanded Access Investigational New Drug (EA-IND) mechanism. CDC holds a nonresearch EA-IND protocol that facilitates access to and use of tecovirimat for treatment of monkeypox.^§ The protocol includes patient treatment and adverse event reporting forms to monitor safety and ensure intended clinical use in accordance with FDA EA-IND requirements. The current multinational monkeypox outbreak, first detected in a country where Monkeypox virus infection is not endemic in May 2022, has predominantly affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) (1,2). To describe characteristics of persons treated with tecovirimat for Monkeypox virus infection, demographic and clinical data abstracted from available tecovirimat EA-IND treatment forms were analyzed. As of August 20, 2022, intake and outcome forms were available for 549 and 369 patients, respectively; 97.7% of patients were men, with a median age of 36.5 years. Among patients with available data, 38.8% were reported to be non-Hispanic White (White) persons, 99.8% were prescribed oral tecovirimat, and 93.1% were not hospitalized. Approximately one half of patients with Monkeypox virus infection who received tecovirimat were living with HIV infection. The median interval from initiation of tecovirimat to subjective improvement was 3 days and did not differ by HIV infection status. Adverse events were reported in 3.5% of patients; all but one adverse event were nonserious. These data support the continued access to and treatment with tecovirimat for patients with or at risk for severe disease in the ongoing monkeypox outbreak.

Tecovirimat^¶ is an antiviral drug developed as a medical countermeasure to treat smallpox, a serious and life-threatening infection caused by Variola virus, of genus Orthopoxvirus; Monkeypox virus belongs to the same genus but typically causes less severe disease.** Global eradication of smallpox was declared by the World Health Assembly in 1980.^†† Because opportunities to develop clinical trials in countries where Monkeypox virus infection is considered endemic have been limited, the efficacy of tecovirimat to treat monkeypox has not been fully evaluated in humans. Instead, efficacy data that supported FDA approval of tecovirimat for smallpox were based on nonhuman primate and rabbit studies^§§ (3); efficacy studies were also conducted in macaque monkeys and prairie dogs (4,5).

During May 2022, a multinational monkeypox virus outbreak (Clade II) was first reported, principally affecting MSM (1,2). Interim CDC guidance currently recommends that tecovirimat be considered in patients with severe disease, those at high risk for severe disease, or those with aberrant infections.^¶¶ This report describes the available demographic and clinical characteristics, clinical indications for use, clinical outcomes, and adverse events reported among some of the first known recipients of tecovirimat treatment under the EA-IND protocol for Monkeypox virus infection in the United States.

During May 29–July 20, 2022, the EA-IND protocol required patient assessment forms at the start of treatment and once during three follow-up time points (assessment A: day 1–7, assessment B: day 8–14, and assessment C: posttreatment). Initially, the protocol’s eligibility criteria included laboratory confirmation of Monkeypox virus or Orthopoxvirus infection, or a presumptive diagnosis based on clinical signs and symptoms. The revised EA-IND protocol (version 6, dated July 20, 2022) was amended as follows: 1) a patient may be eligible for tecovirimat based on clinical signs and symptoms and if there was an epidemiologic link to a case of or exposure to Monkeypox virus, 2) the number of follow-up visits was reduced to one during and one posttreatment, and 3) only reporting of serious adverse events using MedWatch forms was required.*** Data abstracted from patient intake forms included demographic characteristics, orthopoxvirus vaccination status, immune status,^††† laboratory test result, clinical signs and symptoms, reason for tecovirimat administration (i.e., lesions in sensitive anatomic areas, at risk for severe disease, and pain), formulation at the start of treatment (i.e., intravenous or oral), and number of days from symptom onset to administration of the first dose. Data from clinical outcome forms included whether the patient was hospitalized, number of days from initiation of treatment to subjective improvement, recovery status (i.e., recovered with or without sequelae or not yet recovered), and adverse events during and after treatment. The EA-IND protocol was reviewed and approved by CDC’s Institutional Review Board, reviewed and authorized by FDA, and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.^§§§ Analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute). Difference in time to subjective improvement between HIV-positive and patients without HIV-positive status documented were compared using a 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

CDC abstracted data from patient intake forms for 549 persons with confirmed or suspected monkeypox who were prescribed tecovirimat therapy by August 20, 2022, and outcome forms for 369 patients. Data from both intake and outcome forms were available for 174 of these patients. Among 527 patients with intake forms and available data, 515 (97.7%) were male (Table 1). The median age was 36.5 years (IQR = 31.4–43.9 years). Among 464 patients with race and ethnicity data, 180 (38.8%) were White persons, 161 (34.7%) were Hispanic or Latino persons, and 83 (17.9%) were non-Hispanic Black or African American persons. Among 359 patients with available data, approximately two thirds (232, 64.6%) of tecovirimat recipients had lesions affecting <10% of their body; 17 (4.7%) had lesions affecting 75%–100% of their body. Among 529 patients with available data on number of lesions, 299 (56.5%) reported 10–100 lesions at the start of tecovirimat; 210 (39.7%) had fewer than 10 lesions, and 20 (3.8%) had more than 100 lesions. The presence of lesions in anatomic areas that might result in serious sequelae was reported on 191 (79.6%) of the 240 revised intake forms with available data. The most frequently reported underlying medical condition affecting immune status was HIV infection (254, 46.3%); viral load and CD4 count were not reported. Among 495 persons with available data on route of administration, the oral formulation of tecovirimat was prescribed to 494 (99.8%) at the start of therapy. Median interval from symptom onset to receipt of first tecovirimat dose was 7 days (IQR = 5–10 days) (Figure). Among 260 persons with revised intake forms, 124 (47.7%) had laboratory-confirmed Orthopoxvirus infection when tecovirimat treatment commenced.

Among 369 patients with outcome forms, data on hospitalization status was available for 331; among these, 23 (6.9%) were hospitalized after symptom onset (Table 2), and the median duration of hospitalization was 4 days (IQR = 1–5 days). Among 255 patients with available data, the median time to subjective improvement after starting treatment was 3 days (IQR = 2–4 days).^¶¶¶ Among 317 patients with available outcome information, 230 (72.6%) recovered with or without sequelae**** by or before completion of the posttreatment assessment; 87 (27.4%) patients were reported by clinicians to be not yet recovered, 78 of whom had not yet completed the standard 14-day tecovirimat treatment course. Adverse events were reported for 12 (3.5%) of 340 patients with information on adverse events; these included headache (three), nausea (two), visual disturbance (two), weakness (two), and hospitalization for psychiatric reasons (one).^†††† At the time of the posttreatment follow-up visit, three (2.2%) of 137 persons with information available had developed new lesions compared with 25 (13.1%) who had developed new lesions during the first week of treatment. Most (119, 89.5%) patients reported that all lesions were crusted and healing with a new layer of skin under the scab following treatment. Among 174 patients with available data, the interval to subjective improvement did not differ between HIV-positive persons (42; median = 3 days) and persons without documentation of HIV positive status (64; median = 3 days) with available data (p = 0.83).

Acknowledgments

Monkeypox response teams from the participating state and local health departments; Jason Zucker, Columbia University; Stuart Cohen, University of California, Davis; Jason Beverley, Rachel Harold, District of Columbia Health and Wellness; Marshall Glesby, Cornell University; Food and Drug Administration tecovirimat review team; CDC monkeypox clinical consultations team.

Corresponding author: Farrell Tobolowsky, [email protected].

¹CDC Monkeypox Emergency Response Team; ²Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., McLean, Virginia.

References

1. Philpott D, Hughes CM, Alroy KA, et al.; CDC Multinational Monkeypox Response Team. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of monkeypox cases—United States, May 17–July 22, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:1018–22. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7132e3 PMID:35951487
2. Girometti N, Byrne R, Bracchi M, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in individuals attending a sexual health centre in London, UK: an observational analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2022;22:1321–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00411-X PMID:35785793
3. Merchlinsky M, Albright A, Olson V, et al. The development and approval of tecoviromat (TPOXX), the first antiviral against smallpox. Antiviral Res 2019;168:168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.06.005 PMID:31181284
4. Grosenbach DW, Honeychurch K, Rose EA, et al. Oral tecovirimat for the treatment of smallpox. N Engl J Med 2018;379:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705688 PMID:29972742
5. Smith SK, Self J, Weiss S, et al. Effective antiviral treatment of systemic orthopoxvirus disease: ST-246 treatment of prairie dogs infected with monkeypox virus. J Virol 2011;85:9176–87. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02173-10 PMID:21697474
6. Siegrist EA, Sassine J. Antivirals with activity against monkeypox: a clinically oriented review. Clin Infect Dis 2022;ciac622. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac622 PMID:35904001
7. Ogoina D, Iroezindu M, James HI, et al. Clinical course and outcome of human monkeypox in Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:e210–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa143 PMID:32052029
8. Adler H, Gould S, Hine P, et al.; NHS England High Consequence Infectious Diseases (Airborne) Network. Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis 2022;22:1153–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00228-6 PMID:35623380
9. Desai AN, Thompson GR 3rd, Neumeister SM, Arutyunova AM, Trigg K, Cohen SH. Compassionate use of tecovirimat for the treatment of monkeypox infection. JAMA 2022. Epub August 22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.15336 PMID:35994281
10. Minhaj FS, Petras JK, Brown JA, et al. Orthopoxvirus testing challenges for persons in populations at low risk or without known epidemiologic link to monkeypox—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:1155–8.

Abbreviation: HHS = U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
* The initial intake form captured sex without any other qualification, and the revised version of the form captured sex as “sex assigned at birth.” These two variables were combined to form the variable “sex”; therefore, some patients might have been misclassified.
^† HHS region 2 = New Jersey and New York; region 3 = District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia; region 4 = Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee; region 5 = Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin; region 9 = Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Nevada; other regions combined = HHS region 1 (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island), HHS Region 6 (Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas), HHS region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska), HHS region 8 (Colorado), and HHS region 10 (Idaho, Oregon, and Washington).
^§ Vaccination status was assessed by medical record and patient questionnaire, not by physical exam, so those unaware of vaccination status, even those with a scar from Dryvax, might have been missed.
^¶ Clinical indication was only captured on the revised intake form; therefore, the denominator is reduced (240 revised intake forms with nonmissing data).
** Lesions in anatomic areas that might result in serious sequelae (e.g., eye, genitals, and oral mucosa) were not described in the form but reported based on the treating clinician’s assessment based on the phrase “lesions in sensitive anatomical areas.”
^†† Includes receipt of immunosuppressive therapies and the following categories collected from the investigational new drug protocol paperwork: leukemia, lymphoma, bone marrow or organ transplant, congenital immune defects, or other cancers.

FIGURE. Interval from symptom onset to receipt of first tecovirimat (Tpoxx) dose* among symptomatic patients with Monkeypox virus infection treated under the Food and Drug Administration–regulated Expanded Access Investigational New Drug protocol (N = 518)^† — United States, May–August 2022

* Calculated from nonmissing values (444).

^† Overall, 31 patients with missing symptom onset date were excluded.

* Hospitalized at any time after symptom onset. Among 23 patients hospitalized, two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit.
^†At latest follow-up visit, which might have been during treatment or posttreatment. Recovery status was defined by clinical judgment of the treating provider.
^§ Time to first observed (including patient-reported) improvement.
^¶ All adverse events included headache (three), nausea (two), visual disturbance (two), weakness (two), vomiting (one), asymptomatic elevated liver function tests (one), hospitalization for psychiatric reasons (one), rash (one), hives (one), numbness (one), fatigue (one), and dizziness (one).
** Nonmissing data.