National, State-Level, and County-Level Prevalence Estimates of Adults Aged ≥18 Years Self-Reporting a Lifetime Diagnosis of Depression — United States, 2020

Benjamin Lee, MPH1,2; Yan Wang, PhD1; Susan A. Carlson, PhD1; Kurt J. Greenlund, PhD1; Hua Lu, MS1; Yong Liu, MD1; Janet B. Croft, PhD1; Paul I. Eke, PhD1; Machell Town, PhD1; Craig W. Thomas, PhD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Depression is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.

What is added by this report?

During 2020, 18.4% of U.S. adults reported having ever been diagnosed with depression; state-level age-standardized estimates ranged from 12.7% in Hawaii to 27.5% in West Virginia. Model-based age-standardized county-level prevalence estimates ranged from 10.7% to 31.9%, and there was considerable state-level and county-level variability.

What are implications for public health practice?

Decision-makers can use these estimates to guide resource allocation to areas where the need is greatest, possibly by implementing practices such as those recommended by The Guide to Community Preventive Services Task Force and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

Depression is a major contributor to mortality, morbidity, disability, and economic costs in the United States (1). Examining the geographic distribution of depression at the state and county levels can help guide state- and local-level efforts to prevent, treat, and manage depression. CDC analyzed 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data to estimate the national, state-level, and county-level prevalence of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years self-reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression (referred to as depression). During 2020, the age-standardized prevalence of depression among adults was 18.5%. Among states, the age-standardized prevalence of depression ranged from 12.7% to 27.5% (median = 19.9%); most of the states with the highest prevalence were in the Appalachian* and southern Mississippi Valley regions. Among 3,143 counties, the model-based age-standardized prevalence of depression ranged from 10.7% to 31.9% (median = 21.8%); most of the counties with the highest prevalence were in the Appalachian region, the southern Mississippi Valley region, and Missouri, Oklahoma, and Washington. These data can help decision-makers prioritize health planning and interventions in areas with the largest gaps or inequities, which could include implementation of evidence-based interventions and practices such as those recommended by The Guide to Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

BRFSS is an ongoing, state-based, random-digit–dialed landline and cell phone survey of the U.S. adult population aged ≥18 years in all 50 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and participating U.S. territories.§ The combined (landline and cellular) median response rate for the 2020 BRFSS (excluding territories) was 47.6% and ranged among states from 34.5% to 67.2%. A lifetime diagnosis of depression was defined as a “yes” response to the question, “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a depressive disorder, including depression, major depression, dysthymia, or minor depression?” Among the 2020 BRFSS respondents surveyed in all 50 U.S. states and DC, 392,746 (98.9%) responded to the depression question.

This report presents national, state-level, and county-level point estimates and 95% CIs for the prevalence of depression. National values were directly estimated from weighted BRFSS 2020 data for groups defined by age, sex, race or ethnicity, and education, and state-level estimates were directly estimated from weighted BRFSS 2020 data for each state and DC. Point estimates from survey data were estimated as weighted means and pairwise t-tests were used to determine differences (compared with a reference category) by age group, sex, race or ethnicity, and education level. Differences with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Because BRFSS is not designed to provide estimates at the county level, county-level estimates were obtained for all 3,143 U.S. counties using multilevel logistic regression and post-stratification.** The multilevel logistic regression model included depression as the binary dependent variable. The model’s independent variables included each respondent’s age group, sex, race and ethnicity, and education level from BRFSS 2020 data, county-level poverty data (<150% of the poverty level) from the 2016–2020 American Community Survey,†† and random effects for state and county. The model parameters were then applied to the U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2020 county population data to generate model-based county-level estimates of depression prevalence.§§ A Monte Carlo simulation was used to generate 95% CIs for county-level estimates. These model-based county-level estimates were validated by comparing them with the weighted direct survey estimates from counties with sample size ≥500 (183) in BRFSS (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.88). All national and state-level analyses were conducted using SAS-callable SUDAAN software (version 11; RTI International) to account for the BRFSS complex sample design and weighting, and county-level estimation was conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute). All prevalence estimates were age standardized to the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau population.¶¶ This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.***

The age-standardized prevalence of depression among U.S. adults was 18.5% (crude = 18.4%) (Table 1). Age-specific prevalence of depression was highest among those aged 18–24 years (21.5%) and lowest among those aged ≥65 years (14.2%). The age-standardized prevalence of depression was higher among women (24.0%) compared with men (13.3%), higher among non-Hispanic White adults (21.9%) compared with non-Hispanic Black or African-American (16.2%), non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (14.6%), Hispanic or Latino (14.6%), and non-Hispanic Asian (7.3%) adults, and higher among adults who had attained less than a high school education (21.2%) compared with adults with a high school education or equivalent (18.5%) and college degree or higher (15.4%).

Among states, the age-standardized prevalence of depression ranged from 12.7% in Hawaii to 27.5% in West Virginia (median = 19.9%) (Table 2). The 10 states with the highest prevalence were (in descending order) West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Vermont, Alabama, Louisiana, Washington, Missouri, and Montana.

Among counties, the model-based age-standardized estimates ranged from 10.7% (Aleutians East Borough County, Alaska) to 31.9% (Logan County, West Virginia) (median = 21.8%) (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/129404); most of the counties with the highest prevalence were in the Appalachian region, the southern Mississippi Valley region, and in Missouri, Oklahoma, and Washington (Figure). Estimates of depression also varied among counties within states. For example, even though all county prevalence estimates in West Virginia were in the highest quartile, estimates in the state by county ranged from 24.5% to 31.9%.

Discussion

During 2020, approximately one in five U.S. adults reported having ever received a diagnosis of depression by a health care provider, with prevalence of depression higher in women, younger adults, and adults with lower education levels. Previous reports that focused on measures of current depression (e.g., during the previous 2 weeks) rather than lifetime depression showed similar subgroup differences (26), including those observed before and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (46).

The highest prevalence of having ever been diagnosed with depression by a health care professional was found among young adults (aged 18–24 years). Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health show that during 2015 to 2019, previous-year depression increased most rapidly among adolescents (aged 12–17 years) and young adults (aged 18–25 years) (4). Depression can affect people differently by age,††† and the American Psychological Association provides clinical practice guidelines and decision aids for the treatment of depression by age group, including children and adolescents, adults, and older adults.§§§ Health promoting behaviors, including physical activity, quality sleep, and good nutrition, can help to manage symptoms of depression and support positive mental health across the lifespan (7).¶¶¶

There was considerable geographic variation in the prevalence of depression, with the highest state and county estimates of depression observed along the Appalachian and southern Mississippi Valley regions. Depression is a comorbidity for many chronic diseases, including diabetes, arthritis, and cardiovascular diseases (8). These diseases also occur in higher concentrations in states within the Appalachian region,**** suggesting that geographic variation in the prevalence of depression might partially reflect patterns of other chronic diseases. The variation in depression might also reflect the influence of social determinants of health†††† in counties and states, including economic status and differences in access to health care. For example, adults in the Appalachian region tend to have lower incomes, higher poverty rates, and lower education levels, all of which can negatively affect health and well-being.§§§§ The model-based county-level estimates provided in this report offer a starting point for identifying geographic disparities in depression. Incorporating additional neighborhood-level data and context can help guide local public health practitioners in the development and implementation of effective and targeted efforts to address mental health in their communities.

Population-level efforts to address prevention, treatment, and management of depression include tailored and targeted programs to address demographic and geographic disparities. CDC provides information about mental health resources and programs, including those focused on specific populations (e.g., children, older adults, and those with chronic conditions). Depression often co-occurs with other health conditions, and chronic disease self-management programs also help persons with chronic conditions manage their disease and improve their mental health.¶¶¶¶ CDC’s How Right Now***** is a communications campaign designed to promote and strengthen the emotional well-being and resilience of persons disproportionally affected by mental health challenges. The campaign offers evidence-based information and resources to address the emotional health needs of adults (9).

In addition, CPSTF provides communities with a list of recommended interventions to improve mental health or address mental illness.††††† Examples of recommended interventions include collaborative care for the management of depressive disorders, mental health benefits legislation, school-based cognitive behavioral therapy programs to reduce depression and anxiety symptoms (targeted and universal), and depression care management among older adults (clinic- and home-based). SAMHSA’s Evidence-Based Practices Resource Center also provides communities, clinicians, policymakers and others with the information and tools to incorporate evidence-based practices into their communities or clinical settings.§§§§§

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, BRFSS collects self-reported data about whether the respondent has ever received a diagnosis of depression from a health care professional and these data are susceptible to recall, nonresponse, cultural and social desirability, and other reporting biases (10). Differences in reporting could be attributed to sex, cultural, and generational differences, and a person’s willingness to discuss symptoms with a health care provider, as well as their access to a provider. Second, data are collected via a landline and cell phone survey that excludes institutionalized populations or those who cannot be reached via this method, which might affect the representativeness of the samples. Finally, county estimates of prevalence might be imprecise because the multilevel regression modeling approach uses the U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2020 county population estimates, which are estimates of the population rather than census counts.

This report provides current estimates of national, state-level, and county-level prevalence of adults reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression. These estimates can help decision-makers guide resource allocation to areas where the need is greatest, which might include consideration of evidence-based interventions and practices such as those recommended by CPSTF and SAMHSA.

Corresponding author: Benjamin Lee, [email protected].


1Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* The Appalachian region includes all of West Virginia and parts of Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia (https://www.arc.gov/about-the-appalachian-region/); Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia were among the 10 states with the highest prevalence.

The southern Mississippi Valley region includes parts of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee (https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Locations/); Arkansas, Louisiana, and Tennessee were among the 10 states with the highest prevalence.

§ https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/about/index.htm

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2020.html

** The method for the small area estimate approach is used for the PLACES project conducted by CDC, which provides estimates for 29 chronic disease measures at county, place (incorporated and census-designated), census tract, and zip code tabulation area levels. The method does not include territories as part of the 3,143 counties. https://www.cdc.gov/places/methodology/index.html

†† https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/

§§ https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/research/evaluation-estimates/2020-evaluation-estimates/2010s-county-detail.html

¶¶ https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf

*** 45 C.F.R. part 46.102(1)(2), 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.

††† https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression

§§§ https://www.apa.org/depression-guideline

¶¶¶ https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/

**** https://www.arc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Health_Disparities_in_Appalachia_August_2017.pdf

†††† https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/programs-impact/sdoh.htm

§§§§ https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health

¶¶¶¶ https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/interventions/self_manage.htm

***** https://www.cdc.gov/howrightnow/

††††† https://www.thecommunityguide.org/pages/task-force-findings-mental-health.html

§§§§§ https://www.samhsa.gov/resource-search/ebp

References

  1. McLaughlin KA. The public health impact of major depression: a call for interdisciplinary prevention efforts. Prev Sci 2011;12:361–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0231-8 PMID:21732121
  2. Hasin DS, Sarvet AL, Meyers JL, et al. Epidemiology of adult DSM-5 major depressive disorder and its specifiers in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry 2018;75:336–46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4602 PMID:29450462
  3. Villarroel MA, Terlizzi EP. Symptoms of depression among adults: United States, 2019. NCHS data brief, no. 379. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db379.htm
  4. Goodwin RD, Dierker LC, Wu M, Galea S, Hoven CW, Weinberger AH. Trends in U.S. depression prevalence from 2015 to 2020: the widening treatment gap. Am J Prev Med 2022;63:726–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.05.014 PMID:36272761
  5. Daly M, Sutin AR, Robinson E. Depression reported by U.S. adults in 2017–2018 and March and April 2020. J Affect Disord 2021;278:131–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.065 PMID:32956962
  6. Jia H, Guerin RJ, Barile JP, et al. National and state trends in anxiety and depression severity scores among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1427–32. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7040e3 PMID:34618798
  7. Wickham SR, Amarasekara NA, Bartonicek A, Conner TS. The big three health behaviors and mental health and well-being among young adults: a cross-sectional investigation of sleep, exercise, and diet. Front Psychol 2020;11:579205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579205 PMID:33362643
  8. Read JR, Sharpe L, Modini M, Dear BF. Multimorbidity and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2017;221:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.009 PMID:28628766
  9. Burke-Garcia A, Johnson-Turbes A, Mitchell EW, et al. How Right Now? Supporting mental health and resilience amid COVID-19. Traumatology 2021;27:399–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000322 PMID:35360002
  10. Sanchez-Villegas A, Schlatter J, Ortuno F, et al. Validity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression among participants in a cohort study using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I). BMC Psychiatry 2008;8:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-43 PMID:18558014
TABLE 1. Prevalence estimates of adults aged ≥18 years self-reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression,* by selected characteristics — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2020Return to your place in the text
Characteristic Sample size Unweighted no. with depression§ Weighted§ no. with depression (millions) Prevalence§
% (95% CI)
Age-standardized prevalence
% (95% CI)
Overall 392,746 74,830 47.0 18.4 (18.1–18.6) 18.5 (18.2–18.8)
Age group, yrs
18–24 (Ref) 24,850 5,688 6.6 21.5 (20.6–22.5) NA
25–44 93,614 20,862 17.2 19.9 (19.5–20.4)** NA
45–64 136,704 27,876 15.2 18.4 (17.9–18.9)** NA
≥65 137,578 20,404 8.0 14.2 (13.7–14.6)** NA
Sex
Men (Ref) 179,937 24,587 16.3 13.1 (12.8–13.4) 13.3 (12.9–13.6)
Women 212,809 50,243 30.7 23.4 (22.9–23.8)** 24.0 (23.6–24.5)**
Race and ethnicity
AI/AN, non-Hispanic 6,887 1,455 0.6 23.3 (21.1–25.7)** 23.4 (21.1–25.9)
Asian, non-Hispanic 9,414 792 1.1 7.6 (6.6–8.7)** 7.3 (6.3–8.5)**
Black or African American, non-Hispanic 30,158 4,823 4.9 16.1 (15.3–16.9)** 16.2 (15.4–17.0)**
NH/OPI, non-Hispanic 1,248 172 0.1 15.1 (11.8–19.1)** 14.6 (11.4–18.5)**
White, non-Hispanic (Ref) 295,741 58,598 32.2 20.6 (20.3–20.9) 21.9 (21.5–22.2)
Hispanic or Latino†† 31,125 5,257 6.3 14.6 (13.8–15.5)** 14.6 (13.7–15.5)**
Multiracial, non-Hispanic 8,135 2,081 0.9 28.5 (26.3–30.8)** 27.9 (25.8–30.1)**
Other, non-Hispanic 3,545 720 0.3 19.3 (17.0–21.9) 19.6 (17.2–22.2)
Educational attainment
Less than high school (Ref) 25,362 5,962 6.6 21.0 (20.0–22.1) 21.2 (20.1–22.3)
High school or equivalent 104,605 19,909 12.8 18.1 (17.6–18.6)** 18.5 (17.9–19.0)**
Technical college or some college 109,074 23,573 16.4 21.0 (20.4–21.5) 21.5 (20.9–22.0)
College degree or higher 151,949 25,182 11.1 14.9 (14.6–15.3)** 15.4 (15.0–15.8)**

Abbreviations: AI/AN = American Indian or Alaska Native; NA = not applicable; NH/OPI = Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander; Ref = referent group.
* Respondents were classified as having received a diagnosis of depression if they responded “yes” to the question, “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a depressive disorder, including depression, major depression, dysthymia, or minor depression?”
Categories might not sum to sample total because of missing responses for some variables.
§ Weighted using the statistical weights provided in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data set.
Except for age groups, estimates were age-standardized to the 2000 projected U.S. Census Bureau population aged ≥18 years using four groups (18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf
** Statistically significant (p<0.05) difference compared with the indicated Ref category.
†† Respondents who identified as Hispanic or Latino might be of any race.

TABLE 2. State estimates of adults aged ≥18 years self-reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression* — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2020Return to your place in the text
Jurisdiction Sample size Unweighted no. with depression Weighted no. with depression
(thousands)
Prevalence
% (95% CI)
Age-standardized prevalence§
% (95% CI)
Alabama 5,316 1,252 899 23.5 (22.1–25.0) 23.8 (22.2–25.4)
Alaska 3,649 566 87 15.9 (14.1–17.9) 15.7 (13.9–17.6)
Arizona 10,224 1,867 992 17.4 (16.4–18.4) 17.5 (16.4–18.6)
Arkansas 5,216 1,116 544 23.5 (21.9–25.2) 24.2 (22.4–26.1)
California 4,776 758 4,324 14.1 (12.8–15.5) 13.9 (12.7–15.3)
Colorado 10,131 1,836 842 18.5 (17.6–19.4) 18.5 (17.6–19.4)
Connecticut 8,929 1,649 500 17.7 (16.5–19.0) 18.4 (17.0–19.8)
Delaware 4,010 654 121 15.6 (14.1–17.1) 15.8 (14.3–17.6)
District of Columbia 3,410 621 114 19.8 (18.0–21.7) 19.9 (18.1–21.8)
Florida 11,746 2,038 2,570 14.7 (13.4–16.0) 14.9 (13.5–16.4)
Georgia 9,040 1,618 1,413 17.2 (16.0–18.5) 17.3 (16.0–18.6)
Hawaii 7,735 1,098 141 12.7 (11.8–13.7) 12.7 (11.8–13.8)
Idaho 5,947 1,058 258 18.9 (17.5–20.3) 19.0 (17.6–20.5)
Illinois 3,659 509 1,435 14.7 (13.2–16.4) 15.0 (13.4–16.7)
Indiana 8,435 1,753 1,137 21.9 (20.8–23.0) 22.2 (21.1–23.4)
Iowa 9,606 1,541 422 17.4 (16.5–18.4) 18.1 (17.1–19.1)
Kansas 10,475 1,820 424 19.2 (18.2–20.2) 19.6 (18.5–20.7)
Kentucky 3,918 918 838 24.2 (22.5–26.0) 25.0 (23.2–26.9)
Louisiana 4,722 1,089 829 23.5 (21.9–25.2) 23.8 (22.1–25.6)
Maine 10,935 2,271 241 22.1 (20.8–23.3) 23.1 (21.6–24.6)
Maryland 14,202 2,299 740 15.7 (14.9–16.6) 16.1 (15.1–17.0)
Massachusetts 7,127 1,233 990 17.9 (16.7–19.3) 18.2 (16.8–19.5)
Michigan 7,237 1,385 1,530 19.5 (18.3–20.8) 20.3 (19.0–21.7)
Minnesota 15,781 3,249 864 19.8 (19.0–20.6) 20.2 (19.4–21.0)
Mississippi 6,443 1,224 473 20.9 (19.5–22.3) 21.1 (19.6–22.6)
Missouri 9,162 1,975 1,086 22.8 (21.6–24.0) 23.4 (22.1–24.7)
Montana 6,283 1,310 191 22.6 (21.3–23.9) 23.4 (22.0–24.9)
Nebraska 14,748 2,304 245 16.8 (15.8–17.7) 17.0 (16.0–18.0)
Nevada 2,471 447 429 17.6 (15.6–19.7) 17.5 (15.5–19.6)
New Hampshire 6,411 1,285 238 21.5 (20.0–22.9) 22.5 (20.9–24.2)
New Jersey 11,312 1,832 1,055 15.2 (14.4–16.1) 15.6 (14.7–16.5)
New Mexico 6,984 1,207 284 17.6 (16.1–19.1) 17.8 (16.2–19.5)
New York 14,661 2,559 2,560 16.8 (15.9–17.7) 16.7 (15.9–17.7)
North Carolina 5,817 1,201 1,730 20.8 (19.6–22.2) 20.7 (19.4–22.1)
North Dakota 4,454 708 112 19.2 (17.6–21.0) 19.6 (17.9–21.5)
Ohio 14,592 3,242 2,005 22.0 (21.1–23.0) 22.8 (21.7–23.9)
Oklahoma 5,011 1,129 686 22.9 (21.4–24.4) 23.0 (21.5–24.6)
Oregon 5,380 1,152 712 21.2 (19.9–22.5) 21.4 (20.1–22.8)
Pennsylvania 5,520 1,108 2,056 20.2 (18.9–21.7) 20.9 (19.5–22.5)
Rhode Island 5,348 1,135 180 21.1 (19.5–22.9) 21.4 (19.6–23.3)
South Carolina 3,996 808 876 21.4 (19.8–23.1) 21.5 (19.7–23.3)
South Dakota 6,895 949 108 16.1 (14.1–18.3) 16.4 (14.3–18.8)
Tennessee 4,641 1,152 1,296 24.1 (22.4–25.8) 24.4 (22.6–26.2)
Texas 10,968 2,215 3,881 17.7 (16.4–19.1) 17.5 (16.2–18.9)
Utah 10,861 2,398 537 23.1 (22.1–24.2) 22.7 (21.8–23.7)
Vermont 6,511 1,443 118 23.3 (21.7–25.0) 24.2 (22.4–26.0)
Virginia 9,490 1,670 1,153 17.2 (16.2–18.3) 17.4 (16.3–18.5)
Washington 12,837 3,027 1,412 23.4 (22.5–24.4) 23.5 (22.5–24.5)
West Virginia 5,855 1,530 373 26.4 (25.0–27.8) 27.5 (25.9–29.1)
Wisconsin 5,078 913 904 19.8 (18.3–21.5) 20.5 (18.8–22.3)
Wyoming 4,791 709 81 18.3 (16.6–20.0) 18.9 (17.1–20.8)

* Respondents were classified as having depression if they responded “yes” to the question, “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a depressive disorder, including depression, major depression, dysthymia, or minor depression?”
Weighted using the statistical weights provided in the Behavioral Risk Surveillance System data set.
§ Age-standardized to the 2000 projected U.S. Census Bureau population aged ≥18 years using four groups (18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf

Return to your place in the textFIGURE. Model-based age-standardized* county estimates of the percentage of adults aged ≥18 years self-reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression§ — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2020
The figure is a map of the United States with model-based age-standardized county estimates of adults aged ≥18 years self-reporting a lifetime diagnosis of depression, created using data collected by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System during 2020.

* Age-standardized to the 2000 projected U.S. Census Bureau population aged ≥18 years using 13 age groups (18–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, 50–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, and ≥80 years). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf

By quartile.

§ Respondents were classified as having depression if they responded “yes” to the question, “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a depressive disorder, including depression, major depression, dysthymia, or minor depression?”


Suggested citation for this article: Lee B, Wang Y, Carlson SA, et al. National, State-Level, and County-Level Prevalence Estimates of Adults Aged ≥18 Years Self-Reporting a Lifetime Diagnosis of Depression — United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:644–650. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7224a1.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].