Federal Retail Pharmacy Program Contributions to Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations Across Sociodemographic Characteristics — United States, September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023
Weekly / April 4, 2024 / 73(13);286–290
Roua El Kalach, PharmD1; Nkenge Jones-Jack, PhD1; Mattie A. Elam, PharmD2; Abdulhakeem Olorukooba, MD1; Marley Vazquez, MPH1; Shannon Stokley, DrPH1; Sarah Meyer, MD1; Sunanda McGarvey3; Kimvy Nguyen3; Lynn Gibbs Scharf, MPH1; LaTreace Q. Harris, MPH1; Christopher Duggar, MPH1; Lori B. Moore, PharmD1 (View author affiliations)
View suggested citationSummary
What is already known about this topic?
Pharmacies participating in the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP) served as integral partners in national efforts to scale up vaccination capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency response.
What is added by this report?
Among 59.8 million COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses administered in the United States during September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023, 40.5 million (67.7%) were administered by FRPP partners. In urban and rural areas, FRPP partners administered 81.6% and 60.0% of bivalent vaccine doses, respectively.
What are the implications for public health practice?
FRPP partnerships were critical in ensuring access to bivalent COVID-19 vaccination services in the United States and could serve as a model to address vaccination services needs for routine vaccines and during future responses to vaccine-preventable disease emergencies.
Altmetric:
Abstract
The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP) facilitated integration of pharmacies as partners in national efforts to scale up vaccination capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency response. To evaluate FRPP’s contribution to vaccination efforts across various sociodemographic groups, data on COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccine doses administered during September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023, were evaluated from two sources: 1) FRPP data reported directly to CDC and 2) jurisdictional immunization information systems data reported to CDC from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and freely associated states. Among 59.8 million COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses administered in the United States during this period, 40.5 million (67.7%) were administered by FRPP partners. The proportion of COVID-19 bivalent doses administered by FRPP partners ranged from 5.9% among children aged 6 months–4 years to 70.6% among adults aged 18–49 years. Among some racial and ethnic minority groups (e.g., Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black or African American, non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic Asian persons), ≥45% of COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses were administered by FRPP partners. Further, in urban and rural areas, FRPP partners administered 81.6% and 60.0% of bivalent vaccine doses, respectively. The FRPP partnership administered approximately two thirds of all bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses in the United States and provided vaccine access for persons across a wide range of sociodemographic groups, demonstrating that this program could serve as a model to address vaccination services needs for routine vaccines and to provide health services in other public health emergencies.
Introduction
Approximately 90% of U.S. residents live within 5 miles (8 km) of a community pharmacy, making pharmacies a highly accessible health care resource, particularly among low-income communities (1). Understanding the role that pharmacies played during the COVID-19 response is important for future public health planning. The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP), a collaboration between the federal government, U.S. states and territories, and 21 national pharmacy chains and independent pharmacy networks, was established to ensure broad access to COVID-19 vaccines (2). Since February 11, 2021, participating pharmacies have provided access to COVID-19 vaccines across all 50 states, the District of Columbia (D.C.), U.S. territories, and freely associated states (2). On September 1, 2022, CDC recommended COVID-19 bivalent boosters for persons aged ≥12 years (3). On October 12, 2022, the recommendation was expanded to include children aged 5–11 years, and on December 9, 2022, children aged 6 months–4 years (3). COVID-19 mRNA bivalent vaccine doses reported to CDC by FRPP partners and all bivalent vaccine doses administered in the United States during September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023, were assessed across sociodemographic groups to learn more about FRPP’s contribution to COVID-19 bivalent vaccination.
Methods
The proportion of COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses administered in the United States by FRPP partners was calculated using two independent data sources: 1) FRPP bivalent dose administration data reported directly to CDC and 2) all-provider (i.e., FRPP and non-FRPP vaccine providers) data on bivalent vaccine dose administration submitted to each jurisdiction’s immunization information system,* which were then submitted to CDC by each jurisdiction,†,§ for doses administered from September 1, 2022 (the date CDC first issued the recommendation for COVID-19 bivalent vaccination for persons aged ≥12 years) (3), through September 30, 2023. Data were analyzed across six age cohorts (6 months–4 years, and 5–11, 12–17, 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 years), sex, seven categories of race and ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native [AI/AN], non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], non-Hispanic Black or African American, non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic other [other], and non-Hispanic White [White]), and urban-rural classification,¶,** based on the county where the vaccine dose was administered. Data were analyzed using Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (version 18; Microsoft) and are descriptive in nature. This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.††
Results
Approximately 59.8 million bivalent COVID-19 doses were administered in the United States during September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023, including 40.5 million (67.7%) doses administered by FRPP partners. A total of 694 records were excluded from the FRPP database and 113 from the all-provider database because age data were invalid.
By age group, the highest percentage of COVID-19 bivalent doses administered by FRPP partners was to persons aged 18–49 years (70.6%), and the lowest was to children aged 6 months–4 years (5.9%) (Table 1). More than two thirds of males (66.9%) and females (68.6%) were vaccinated through FRPP partners. By racial and ethnic group, the highest proportions of bivalent COVID-19 doses administered by FRPP partners were among Asian (60.2%) and White persons (56.2%), and the lowest proportions were among AI/AN persons (21.9%) and persons of other races (22.3%). The percentage of doses administered to persons with unknown race and ethnicity was higher in the FRPP data (29.4%) than in the all-provider data (10.9%).
Among the full analytic sample of 59 distinct jurisdictions, all but five (American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, and Palau) had FRPP partners. Among the 54 jurisdictions with FRPP partners, at least one half of bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered by FRPP partners in 42 (77.8%) jurisdictions. Among the 52 jurisdictions with urban designated areas and the 48 jurisdictions with rural designated areas, the proportion of bivalent doses administered by FRPP partners was higher among urban areas (81.6%) compared with rural areas (60.0%) (Table 2). FRPP pharmacies administered ≥50% of bivalent doses in 45 of 52 (86.5%) jurisdictions’ urban designated counties and 33 of 48 (68.8%) jurisdictions’ rural designated counties.
Discussion
During September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023, FRPP partners administered 40.5 million bivalent COVID-19 doses, representing more than two thirds (67.7%) of all bivalent COVID-19 doses administered across the United States and its territories and freely associated states. In comparison, previous data show that FRPP partners administered 45% of monovalent doses during February 11, 2021–January 31, 2022 (2). Factors that might have contributed to the higher proportion of bivalent compared with monovalent COVID-19 vaccines doses administered by FRPP partners include a higher level of awareness of COVID-19 vaccine availability at pharmacies, ease of accessibility (e.g., extended hours of operation, walk-in and scheduled appointments, and geographically convenient locations), and fewer COVID-19 mass vaccination clinics during this period compared with the time when the original monovalent vaccine first became available (2). Although FRPP partners were effective in making COVID-19 vaccines widely accessible, differences in use of FRPP partner vaccination services was observed across age groups, racial and ethnic groups, sex, and urbanicity.
Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines through FRPP partners and from other vaccine providers, overall U.S. bivalent vaccination coverage was substantially lower than that of completed monovalent primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Data from CDC’s COVID Data Tracker reveal that as of May 11, 2023 (the end date of the public health emergency), 17% of the U.S. population had received the bivalent vaccine,§§ compared with 69.5% who had completed a primary series. Among persons considering bivalent vaccination, commonly reported barriers to receipt of bivalent COVID-19 vaccine have included being too busy or forgetting to get vaccinated and having concerns related to side effects, whereas the main concerns reported by persons reporting no intent to receive a bivalent vaccine were more often related to trust, belief that vaccination was not necessary, and concerns about safety. However, the results of surveys conducted in March and April 2023 indicate that fewer than 5% of respondents reported access issues of time or costs as concerns, suggesting that access was not a substantial contributor to low vaccination rates (4).
FRPP vaccinations were reported for all evaluated demographic groups, including all age groups. However, FRPP partners administered the highest proportion of bivalent vaccine doses to adults, with similar percentages of doses administered to adults in all age groups (range = 69.3%–70.6%). FRPP partners administered a lower proportion of bivalent doses to children aged 5–11 years (33.6%) and 6 months–4 years (5.9%). This difference in percentages of doses administered to adult and pediatric recipients is not unexpected: historically, more adults than children have received annual influenza vaccination at pharmacies (5). Surveys conducted during September 2021 found that parents reported a higher level of trust when vaccinating their child at their regular clinic (63%), compared with vaccination at 1) a local pharmacy (34%), 2) a clinic different from their regular one (30%), 3) school with the parent present (25%), 4) temporary mass vaccination clinic (25%), and 5) school without the parent present (15%) (6). Pharmacy administration of COVID-19 vaccination to children was possible in part because of the Public Readiness and Preparedness Act, which lowered the age at which children could be vaccinated at pharmacies to 3 years in all states, making COVID-19 vaccination accessible for some age groups not typically vaccinated at pharmacies in many states (7). Although FRPP helped during this public health emergency, pediatricians, health departments and federally qualified health centers were needed to ensure that young children had adequate access to COVID-19 vaccines.
FRPPs administered a large proportion of COVID-19 bivalent doses to most racial and ethnic groups. However, the proportion was lower for AI/AN persons, a group that might have relied more on Indian Health Service facilities or other vaccine providers.
The FRPPs’ contribution to COVID-19 bivalent doses was higher among urban than rural counties. Possible reasons for this difference are the potential higher accessibility of pharmacies in urban areas, as well as the fact that independent pharmacies in rural areas might have been less likely to partner with the FRPP. In addition, factors such as the availability of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in primary care settings or other settings could have affected the proportion of COVID-19 bivalent doses administered by FRPP partners located in urban versus rural areas (8,9). Further evaluations are needed to understand the factors contributing to differences in pharmacy provider vaccination among urban and rural residents.
Limitations
The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, COVID-19 vaccination coverage estimates were not possible using data from this analysis because unique persons vaccinated could not be identified. Second, the age groups used to describe COVID-19 vaccination among younger children include those aged 6 months–4 years. However, FRPP data only include vaccinated children aged ≥3 years, unlike the all-provider data, which included vaccinations administered to children and infants as young as age 6 months. Third, the higher number and percentage of records with race and ethnicity reported as unknown in the FRPP data compared with those in the all-provider data might have resulted in less accurate representation and potential underestimation of FRPP contributions for some racial and ethnic groups. Finally, the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification was developed in 2013, and the urban-rural designations used likely affected these analyses. Several counties classified as rural in 2013 might no longer be rural. In addition, a larger percentage of records were removed from the all-provider data (15.0%) than from the FRPP data (0.2%) because of the lack of matching urban–rural classification. Both factors might have skewed the overall pharmacy contribution, particularly in examining the percentage of urban and rural doses administered by FRPP partners.
Implications for Public Health Practice
FRPP partners were critical in ensuring access to bivalent COVID-19 vaccination services throughout the United States. This partnership could serve as a model to address vaccination services needs for administration of routinely recommended vaccines and potential future responses to vaccine-preventable disease emergencies. Further strategies to support improvement in race and ethnicity data collection and reporting, particularly in pharmacy settings, are needed to help guide public health practices. Although the public health emergency has ended, the need to ensure that the U.S. population has equitable access to all recommended vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, remains. FRPP demonstrated that partnering with pharmacies, in addition to other vaccine providers, can help accelerate vaccine access provision across the United States and address other potential infectious diseases-related public health emergencies.
Acknowledgments
The 21 pharmacy partners participating in the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program, federal entities, immunization program managers; immunization information system managers; other staff members of the immunization programs in the 64 jurisdictions that submitted COVID-19 data to CDC; CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force.
Corresponding author: Roua El Kalach, [email protected].
1Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 2Goldbelt Professional Services, LLC, Chesapeake, Virginia; 3Peraton, Reston, Virginia.
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
* Providers were required by CDC to document COVID-19 vaccination in their medical records within 24 hours of administration and in their jurisdiction’s immunization information system (IIS) within 72 hours of administration during the public health emergency. IISs are confidential, computerized, population-based systems that collect and consolidate vaccination data from providers in 64 public health jurisdictions and can be used to track vaccines administered across multiple provider types and measure vaccination coverage. The 64 jurisdictions comprise the 50 U.S. States, eight U.S. territories and freely associated states (i.e., American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, Palau, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), and six local jurisdictions (Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; New York, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Antonio, Texas; and Washington, D.C.).
† Although there are a total of 64 IIS jurisdictions, the analytic sample for this report only includes 59 distinct jurisdictions because of local jurisdictional data (i.e., Chicago, Houston, New York City, Philadelphia, and San Antonio) being included within their respective state’s data.
§ Bivalent vaccine dose administration data from Idaho and Texas (from persons aged<18 years) were not reported to CDC through their IISs; instead, these jurisdictions submitted their data on bivalent vaccine doses administered using aggregate table shells aligned with the all-provider data for inclusion in the overall data.
¶ The 2013 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) urban-rural classification scheme (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm) was used to classify counties where bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered in urban and rural categories. Urban counties were defined by combining four of these six categories (large central metropolitan, large fringe metropolitan, medium metropolitan, and small metropolitan), and rural counties were defined based on two categories (micropolitan and noncore). Records with missing administration counties and those lacking NCHS designations were excluded from the urban-rural analyses.
** The overall analytic sample for this analysis was 59 jurisdictions; however, seven U.S. territories and freely associated states (i.e., American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, Palau, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) lacked urban-rural county level designations. Among the remaining jurisdictions, all 52 contained urban-designated areas; however, four jurisdictions (D.C., Delaware, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) had no rural designations, leaving only 48 jurisdictions represented in the final rural analyses.
†† 45 C.F.R. part 46.102(l)(2); 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.
§§ https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-total-admin-rate-total
References
- Berenbrok LA, Tang S, Gabriel N, et al. Access to community pharmacies: a nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC) 2022;62:1816–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.003 PMID:35965233
- Kim C, Guo A, Yassanye D, et al. The U.S. Federal Retail Pharmacy Program: optimizing COVID-19 vaccine delivery through a strategic public-private partnership. Public Health Rep 2023;138:870–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549231186606 PMID:37503697
- CDC. Interim clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines: appendices, references, and previous updates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2024. Accessed February 12, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us-appendix.html#appendix-a
- Schorpp S, Calhoun K, Razzaghi H, Black CL. Concerns about bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and reasons for non-vaccination among adults who completed a primary series—Omnibus Survey, March 10–April 30, 2023 & Household Pulse Survey, March 1–April 10, 2023. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/covidvaxview/pubs-resources/covid-vaccine-reasons-non-vaccination.html
- Srivastav A, Williams WW, Santibanez TA, et al. National early-season flu vaccination coverage, United States, November 2017. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/nifs-estimates-nov2017.htm
- Chatham-Stephens K, Carter RJ, Duggar C, et al. An overview of the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine program—the U.S. experience vaccinating children ages 6 months through 17 years. Vaccine 2024;S0264-410X(24)00166-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.019 PMID:38429152
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Third Amendment to Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/24/2020-18542/third-amendment-to-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical
- Carpenter DM, Hastings T, Westrick S, et al. Rural community pharmacists’ ability and interest in administering COVID-19 vaccines in the Southern United States. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC) 2022;62:1379–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2022.01.013 PMID:35221234
- Popovian R, Winegarden W, Rivera E, Gavigan K. Accessibility of adult immunizations in pharmacies compared to physician offices in low-income communities. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC) 2022;62:1644–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2022.03.021 PMID:35491381
Suggested citation for this article: El Kalach R, Jones-Jack N, Elam MA, et al. Federal Retail Pharmacy Program Contributions to Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations Across Sociodemographic Characteristics — United States, September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024;73:286–290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7313a2.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to [email protected].